Take the 2-minute tour ×
Christianity Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for committed Christians, experts in Christianity and those interested in learning more. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Imagine Madoff coming to your living room saying, "I got investment, I want you to invest your whole money to me."

You test them. You left some changes on the table and pretend to do something else. You got back and see the changes are still there.

Ah I can trust Madoff in small things. He must be trustable on big things. Madoof here is cash then.

That would be stupid right.

Many people don't steal small things not because they're infinitely trustworthy. People don't steal small things so they have their reputation intact and can steal big things.

Madoff didn't take the change not because he is trustworthy. Madoff didn't take the change because the change is small. He aims to steal big. So those who are trustworthy on small things are not necessarily trustworthy on big things.

I once lost $30k due to a fraudster that build trust by being honest on small deals. When the deals got big they run away.

Most corrupt officials that steal billions won't steal chickens or bread.

On then face of it, this appears to contradict some of Jesus teaching on trust.

http://biblehub.com/luke/16-10.htm

"Whoever can be trusted with very little can also be trusted with much, and whoever is dishonest with very little will also be dishonest with much.

How is this seeming contradiction resolved?

Note: I honestly trusted this interpretation on Jesus words and lost almost $1 million dollar of profit because my ex employee become my competitor. Consider this a form of "customer complain" on Christianity. What? I interpret that wrong again?

share|improve this question
    
This doesn't appear to be specifically about Christianity. As is, it is a general philosophy question, and it is off-topic as a Truth question "Is Jesus wrong?" I'm not sure you can bring it into site guidelines with a simple edit. Please see question types that the community finds acceptable. If possible, edit this question so that it better fits into one of those question types. –  fredsbend Jul 4 at 15:24
    
How you define "small" is the problem with your illustration. Someone who's untrustworthy will be untrustworthy in many things, big and small, but not necessarily all things. So the man doesn't steal my change. Does he lie? Does he fulfill his promises? Does he behave differently when he thinks people are watching? –  mojo Jul 4 at 19:20
1  
A relatively simple edit stops this from being a truth question and makes it about Christianity. I've made that edit. –  DJClayworth Jul 4 at 21:09
1  
As an aside, Sharon, your analysis of the fraudsters is too simplistic. Madoff would (perhaps) not take your change not because it's too small, but because the effort is too big, or the chance of being caught is too big, compared with the benefit. Maybe he would have taken your change if he thought that there was absolutely no way he would have been caught. Likewise your fraudster was not being honest with the initial transactions - he was using them (dishonestly) to lay the foundations for his later fraud. –  DJClayworth Jul 4 at 21:15

3 Answers 3

With parables you have to remember that they are directed at a specific audience, and make a specific point. Trying to extrapolate to draw conclusions outside the purpose of the parable would lead to a wrong conclusion. Parables are also used to illustrate general principles, not to lay down hard and fast rules.

In the Parable of the Talents, the point is about the behaviour of the servants. Jesus makes that pretty clear from context. The conclusions the hearer should draw are about parallels to the servants, not to the master. So (to simplify a little) the lesson from this parable is "work hard with what you are given to generate 'profit' for your master". You could also reasonably infer the lesson: "show yourself trustworthy in small things so that you will be trusted with larger things". (That's different from the lesson you are talking about.)

To derive a lesson that "anyone who is trustworthy with small things is also always trustworthy with large ones" would be outside the scope of the parable. It's focussing on the wrong part of the parable. The character in the story doesn't say it is a general rule, but only as something specific to another character: "Because you have shown yourself trustworthy in small things..." We shouldn't infer that it is applicable in all cases.

share|improve this answer
    
This question doesn't appear to be specifically about Christianity. As is, it is a general philosophy question, and it is off-topic as a Truth question "Is Jesus wrong?" This leaves me wondering why you haven't voted to close it. –  fredsbend Jul 4 at 15:25

Where you seem to be missing the mark is in trying to compare the situation that the parable describes to modern day, while it is the message that Jesus was teaching that should be studied as how does this apply to me today.

The message Jesus wanted them and us today was not that Trust is connected to whether we are faithful with the small things and therefore we are trustworthy with larger things.

Jesus was teaching those around him two very important things;

Luke 16:1 and 2 KJV And he said also unto his disciples, There was a certain rich man, which had a steward; and the same was accused unto him that he had wasted his goods. And he called him, and said unto him, How is it that I hear this of thee? give an account of thy stewardship; for thou mayest be no longer steward.

Jesus wanted them and us to understand that just as the unfaithful servant we stand
the risk of heading down a path of dishonesty and once on that we can either repent
and keep the blessings of our masters, or continue down that path to judgment and our
own destruction.

secondly Jesus was saying to them that to continue down that road to destruction is
to secure a the same fate as all other unfaithful people. (the debtors owed the owner
and not the servant, and they were robbing him just as the servant was.)

Luke 16:3 through 9 KJV Then the steward said within himself, What shall I do? for my lord taketh away from me the stewardship: I cannot dig; to beg I am ashamed. I am resolved what to do, that, when I am put out of the stewardship, they may receive me into their houses. So he called every one of his lord's debtors unto him, and said unto the first, How much owest thou unto my lord? And he said, An hundred measures of oil. And he said unto him, Take thy bill, and sit down quickly, and write fifty. Then said he to another, And how much owest thou? And he said, An hundred measures of wheat. And he said unto him, Take thy bill, and write fourscore. And the lord commended the unjust steward, because he had done wisely: for the children of this world are in their generation wiser than the children of light. And I say unto you, Make to yourselves friends of the mammon of unrighteousness; that, when ye fail, they may receive you into everlasting habitations.

Lastly Jesus is telling them God's outlook toward those actions in the trust analogy.

Luke 16:10 through 13 He that is faithful in that which is least is faithful also in much: and he that is unjust in the least is unjust also in much. If therefore ye have not been faithful in the unrighteous mammon, who will commit to your trust the true riches? And if ye have not been faithful in that which is another man's, who shall give you that which is your own? No servant can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon.

If You do not have the basic principles of honesty, integrity, and etc. so that you
do not exercise proper care of what he gives you here on earth, why should God give
you the riches of Heaven since indications are that they would have no more value to
you than what he has already entrusted to you.

Hope this helps.

share|improve this answer
    
This question doesn't appear to be specifically about Christianity. As is, it is a general philosophy question, and it is off-topic as a Truth question "Is Jesus wrong?" This leaves me wondering why you haven't voted to close it. –  fredsbend Jul 4 at 15:26
    
@fredsbend I did not vote to close it, because having reviewed the questions by this poster and having voted to close most of them without trying to draw their attention to understanding the scope of Christianity, seems to have led to their becoming more confused. While I understand that the site is not Evangelical it seems that to give someone a base to begin to understand the Christian concept, is preferable to ultimately turning them off to Christianity all together. –  Bye Jul 6 at 1:52

Well first its a simple ideal not to be overly drawn upon because not every individual is the same but in a general sense if you really think about it, the statement is true. If I can trust my daughter to be responsible with something I can detetmine wether or not she could be responsible in another situation, if a man does great governing one district than I may find him fit to govern three districts or four

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.