Christianity Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for committed Christians, experts in Christianity and those interested in learning more. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

What are the oldest known writings that state that Mary was without sin?

share|improve this question
Why did you remove the immaculate-conception tag? That is what you are asking about, not the virginity of Mary! Immaculate conception on Wikipedia – curiousdannii Jun 21 '14 at 2:32
From your link: "The doctrine of the immaculate conception of Mary concerns her own conception in her mother's womb, not Mary's conception of Jesus (the virgin birth of Jesus)"- I've never heard that, sorry. I've never heard "immaculate conception" refer to any conception other than Christ's, but I'm not Catholic. The Immaculate Conception tag was indeed correct. Apologies. – Andrew Jun 21 '14 at 3:17
No worries! The name is a bit confusing (because even if she was born to sin she could still have chosen to sin later), but it is what it is. – curiousdannii Jun 21 '14 at 3:53
It didn't become dogma in the RCC until Vatican I in the late 1800s, but the concept was believed by individual Catholics before then of course. – david brainerd Jun 22 '14 at 22:53
up vote 5 down vote accepted

The earliest Christian writings outside the bible are from what are called the Church Fathers, from around the middle of the second century onwards for a few hundred years.

On the Immaculate Conception explicitly, the earliest would appear to be Hippolytus and Origen:

He [Jesus] was the ark formed of incorruptible wood. For by this is signified that His tabernacle [Mary] was exempt from defilement and corruption (Hippolytus, Orat. In Illud, Dominus pascit me, in Gallandi, Bibl. Patrum, II, 496 ante [A.D. 235]).

This Virgin Mother of the Only-begotten of God is called Mary, worthy of God, immaculate of the immaculate, one of the one (Origen, Homily 1 [A.D. 244]).

Earlier writers hint at the doctrine, by comparing Mary to Eve, who was created without the stain of sin:

[Jesus] became man by the Virgin so that the course that was taken by disobedience in the beginning through the agency of the serpent might be also the very course by which it would be put down. Eve, a virgin and undefiled, conceived the word of the serpent and bore disobedience and death. But the Virgin Mary received faith and joy when the angel Gabriel announced to her the glad tidings that the Spirit of the Lord would come upon her and the power of the Most High would overshadow her, for which reason the Holy One being born of her is the Son of God. And she replied, "Be it done unto me according to your word" (Luke 1:38) (Justin Martyr, Dialogue with Trypho 100 [A.D. 155]).

Consequently, then, Mary the Virgin is found to be obedient, saying, "Behold, O Lord, your handmaid; be it done to me according to your word." Eve . . . who was then still a virgin although she had Adam for a husband — for in paradise they were both naked but were not ashamed; for, having been created only a short time, they had no understanding of the procreation of children . . . having become disobedient [sin], was made the cause of death for herself and for the whole human race; so also Mary, betrothed to a man but nevertheless still a virgin, being obedient [no sin], was made the cause of salvation for herself and for the whole human race. . . . Thus, the knot of Eve's disobedience was loosed by the obedience of Mary. What the virgin Eve had bound in unbelief, the Virgin Mary loosed through faith (Iranaeus, Against Heresies 3:22:24 [A.D. 189]).

There are further, later comments where I found those but those are the earliest cited. These four are the earliest of the Fathers.

share|improve this answer

It is important to note that before the "Edict of Milan" the church was a persecuted Church and the Gospel as well as the traditions passed on by the apostles were spread orally and in many distant geographical areas.

After the Edict, Christians under the protection and support of the Emperor Constantine where able to freely practice and articulate those truths that were preserved.

The Church now freed from persecution would as they should, define, by the bishops and presbyters, firstly those things concerning Christ. Which they did in the formulation of the Creed. The kingdom of God (the Church) now free to blossom into the biggest of trees, had many more things to address. Arianism, gnostism, montanism, Sabellianism, the early teachings of some that concerned the Lord himself, primacy of concern.

When the Church, after addressing the heretical teachings in the early times, now could address other concerns.

We have the writings of Saint Ambrose:

"Mary, a virgin not only undefiled but a virgin whom grace has made inviolate, free from every stain." - St. Ambrose of Milan, 340-370 AD.

Saint Augustine:

"Every personal sin must be excluded from the Blessed Virgin Mary for the sake of the honor of God." - St. Augustine, 390 AD.

Saint Ephraem:

"You, and your Mother are alone in this. You are wholly beautiful in every respect. There is in you, Lord, no stain, nor any spot in your Mother." - St. Ephraem, 350 AD.

We have the first century cave pictures of Mary at Saint Agnes, depicting Mary as very present and having even then her unique roll as intersesser.

Then of course there is the

"Sub tuum praesidium"

Greek Text 250 AD.

Ὑπὸ τὴν σὴν εὐσπλαγχνίαν, καταφεύγομεν, Θεοτόκε. Τὰς ἡμῶν ἱκεσίας, μὴ παρίδῃς ἐν περιστάσει, ἀλλ᾽ ἐκ κινδύνων λύτρωσαι ἡμᾶς, μόνη Ἁγνή, μόνη εὐλογημένη.


Beneath your compassion, We take refuge, O Mother of God: do not despise our petitions in time of trouble: but rescue us from dangers, only pure, only blessed one.

These doctrines preserved in tradition by the bishops and the faithful were past down most likely from its origins in the Large city of Ephesis where the Evangelist John preached and with him under his care by the instruction of God, The Virgin Mary spent many days preaching and reciting all those things that were not written but understood organically in oral tradition.

"Blessed rather are those who hear the word of God and obey it."

A correction the Lord gave to the crowd when a woman suggested that she was blessed for baring Jesus and breast feeding him. The correction was not to rebuke the woman and have Christ take away the very honor that the stranger gives to The Mother of God, but to instruct her as to why She and anyone else would be considered blessed. To hear the word of God and obey it as Mary did with her consent to be "The Women" of Prophecy.

Christ heard the will of God the Faher and obeyed it, despite the human desires of the flesh, in the same way, Mary too hears the will of the lord and obeys.

Conceived without sin, saved by Christ prior to birth from any and all sin, She continues even now to do the will of God.

share|improve this answer
Great answer, did you mean to say that Our Lady "preached" or was that a figure of speech? (Not saying, I wouldn't love to hear her sermon, but I doubt that any woman would be preaching back then). Not nitpicking, you just gave me pause to think what that would look like. – Peter Turner Oct 21 '15 at 11:09
@PeterTurner I believe that she would have Preached her role in a monor fitting to her position and the custom at the time. Remember, not only was Saint John Present but Saint Paul as well. I can't imagine inquistive early Christians not listening or even demanding an account by Mary, nor can I imagine how a person free from Pride and full of Humility would have answered. It boggles the mind. – Marc Oct 21 '15 at 17:19
@Marc Thank you for the answer. I would think she only needed to testify to what she had known for those to hear her and believe- after all she was his own mother. Who can know a son like his own mother? And who would not believe a mother's testimony about her own son? – Andrew Oct 24 '15 at 2:04
@Marc Do you think this is genuinely the selfsame Paul as the writer of the Epistles? – Andrew Oct 24 '15 at 2:05
@Andrew simply ready Acts 19, the rest of the details can be peiced together. Perhaps it's been done here already. – Marc Oct 24 '15 at 2:17

Luke 1:28:

And the angel being come in, said unto her: Hail, full of grace [κεχαριτωμένη], the Lord is with thee: blessed art thou among women.

To be full of grace to such an extent as to conceive the 2nd Person of the Holy Trinity is incompatible with sinning.

From the Haydock Commentary on Luke 1:28:

Hail, full of grace: [5] by the greatest share of divine graces granted to any creature. This translation, approved by the ancient Fathers, agrees with the ancient Syriac and Arabic versions. There was no need therefore to change it into gracious, with Erasmus; into freely beloved, with Beza; into highly favoured, with the Prot. translators. For if seven deacons (Acts vi. 3.) are said to be full of the Holy Ghost, as it is again said of S. Stephen, (Acts vii. 55.) and also of the same S. Stephen, (Acts vi. v. 8.) that he was full of grace, (as the learned Dr. Wells translates it in his amendments made to the Prot. translation) why should any one be offended at this salutation given to the blessed mother of God; who would not have been raised to this highest dignity, had not her s\oul been first prepared for it by the greatest share of divine graces? — The Lord is with thee, by his interior graces; and now, at this moment, is about to confer upon thee the highest of all dignities, by making thee truly the mother of God. Wi. — The Catholic Church makes frequent use of these words which were brought by the archangel from heaven, as well to honour Jesus Christ and his virgin Mother, as because they were the first glad tidings of Christ's incarnation, and man's salvation; and are the very abridgment and sum of the whole gospel. In the Greek Church, they are used daily in the Mass. See the Liturgy of S. James, and that of S. Chrysos.

Pope Pius IX gives in his dogmatic definition on the Immaculate Conception, Ineffabilis Deus (1854), many reasons for Mary's sinlessness. Here's what he says about Luke 1:28 and Luke 1:42:

When the Fathers and writers of the Church meditated on the fact that the most Blessed Virgin was, in the name and by order of God himself, proclaimed full of grace [Cf. Lk 1:28.] by the Angel Gabriel when he announced her most sublime dignity of Mother of God, they thought that this singular and solemn salutation, never heard before, showed that the Mother of God is the seat of all divine graces and is adorned with all gifts of the Holy Spirit. To them Mary is an almost infinite treasury, an inexhaustible abyss of these gifts, to such an extent that she was never subject to the curse and was, together with her Son, the only partaker of perpetual benediction. Hence she was worthy to hear Elizabeth, inspired by the Holy Spirit, exclaim: "Blessed are you among women, and blessed is the fruit of your womb." [Ibid., 42. ]

He also says:

As if these splendid eulogies and tributes were not sufficient, the Fathers proclaimed with particular and definite statements that when one treats of sin, the holy Virgin Mary is not even to be mentioned; for to her more grace was given than was necessary to conquer sin completely. [Cf. St. Augustine: De Natura et Gratia, c. 36. ] They also declared that the most glorious Virgin was Reparatrix of the first parents, the giver of life to posterity; that she was chosen before the ages, prepared for himself by the Most High, foretold by God when he said to the serpent, "I will put enmities between you and the woman." [Gn 3:15]—unmistakable evidence that she was crushed the poisonous head of the serpent. And hence they affirmed that the Blessed Virgin was, through grace, entirely free from every stain of sin, and from all corruption of body, soul and mind; that she was always united with God and joined to him by an eternal covenant; that she was never in darkness but always in light; and that, therefore, she was entirely a fit habitation for Christ, not because of the state of her body, but because of her original grace.

share|improve this answer
How old is the Haydock commentary? – curiousdannii Jun 23 '14 at 7:08
How do you account for Acts 6:8 then? "And Stephen, full of grace and power, was doing great wonders and signs among the people." Was Stephen sinless too? – curiousdannii Jun 23 '14 at 7:09
@curiousdannii: Rev. George Leo Haydock (1774-1849). The version I quote from was published in 1859 as Haydock's Catholic Family Bible and Commentary (printed by Edward Dunigan and Brother, New York, New York). – Geremia Jun 23 '14 at 14:35
@curiousdannii: I think it's safe to say St. Stephen committed no sin at least during the time immediately leading up to and including his martyrdom. Plus, Luke 1:28 also says Mary was (2) with the Lord and (3) blessed. – Geremia Jun 23 '14 at 14:51
If it is taught by the Church, it has to be from Apostolic times, and the Gospel passage you provide is direct link to this period. – user13992 Aug 28 '14 at 3:58

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.