Take the 2-minute tour ×
Christianity Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for committed Christians, experts in Christianity and those interested in learning more. It's 100% free, no registration required.

In Science class, we were taught that a Scientific theory, even one without "evidence" to back it up, is true until it can be disproven.

That being said, and assuming that's actually true, Why is the burden always on Theists to prove the existence of God, and not that of Atheists to disprove it?

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by Jayarathina Madharasan, Mawia, Caleb Jun 24 at 12:13

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

    
    
Also, the burden of proof, and where it lies in regards to applied Apologetics is addressed at What is “Apologetics”, exactly, and how is it used to defend the Christian faith? –  David Stratton Apr 7 at 23:03
add comment

1 Answer 1

up vote 7 down vote accepted

I think you are misunderstanding the idea of a scientific theory being "true" until it's disproven.

The scientific method progresses by people proposing theories about the universe and how it works. For a theory to be scientific, it must be falsifiable. This means that you can do an experiment that disproves the theory. For example I could have some ideas about gravity that results in a conclusion that apples will fall upwards if I drop them. By doing an experiment, I can show that apples do not fall upward when dropped, and therefore the theory must be false because its predictions are wrong.

When you are referring to a theory being "true" in your question, I suspect what you really mean is that the theory is falsifiable because it makes predictions that can be tested with an experiment, but that no one has done the experiment to falsify it yet.

There is another sense of a theory being "true" in science, and that is one in which many, many experiments have been performed, and none have managed to falsify the theory yet. Instead, the theory makes predictions and the experiments continuously confirm the predictions. However, there may still eventually be an experiment performed that disproves the theory. For example, the Newtonian view of physics is a view that was true in this sense despite much experimentation for hundreds of years. But nowadays it can be shown to be wrong via experimentation.

Regarding your question, I suspect that the problem atheists have with theists is that the theist's claims cannot be falsified in a scientific sense. There is no theory of the form "if God exists then predict A,B,C..." So the atheist cannot perform any experiment to disprove the theory. When you say they put the burden onto the theists, maybe they are in fact asking for a better scientific theory about God -- which may not be possible given that science deals with the material world and religion the spiritual.

share|improve this answer
1  
Spike, I agree with both you and mikenz. Spike, great thinking, and I see what you mean. Mikenz, that is the right answer. –  Hand of Don Apr 7 at 19:19
3  
I agree with most of that but I must disagree with the last paragraph. (a) The Bible most certainly does deal with the material world. It's all about specific people doing specific things. (b) Atheists will say that Christianity is "unscientific" because there is no possible experiment that could prove it wrong ... and then they claim to prove it wrong. I agree that Christianity is not "scientific" in the sense of being testable like the theory of gravity can be tested in the laboratory. Christianity is primarily historical, and must be tested like a theory that Vikings discovered America ... –  Jay Apr 9 at 6:37
1  
... before Columbus can be tested. –  Jay Apr 9 at 6:37
add comment

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.