Take the 2-minute tour ×
Christianity Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for committed Christians, experts in Christianity and those interested in learning more. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I'm interested in finding out what the major views are on Adam's motivation to sin if he was not deceived?

  1. The biblical understanding of Abraham being willing to sacrifice his son was that he believed God would make it right (Hebrews 11:19).

  2. Jesus loved us so much that, even though He knew we would fall into sin, He created everything anyway: Because He knew and wanted to redeem us even with that happening.

  3. Jesus is the "last Adam" (1 Cor 15:45). Is Adam a 'type' of Christ? Is Adam a 'first Christ' (not really a 'Christ' / Saviour, but a foreshadow, or symbol or similar) ?

So, given the above, if Adam was not deceived (1 Tim 2:14), if he was really not deceived, then why eat the fruit?

share|improve this question

closed as primarily opinion-based by David Stratton, Peter Turner, Daи, James T, Flimzy Mar 25 at 6:19

Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

    
This doesn't look like a really good fit for this particular site. The question seems to be asking for our opinions on the validity of a line of thinking, which is good for a discussion forum, but not this site. This site is intentionally not an open discussion forum. I'd recommend you read help page and How we are different than other sites? –  David Stratton Mar 11 at 2:10
1  
Thought I might get one of these responses, I've read enough stackexchange to see that might happen :) Does stackexchange answer what the positions are? Is that a better way to frame this question? –  user10330 Mar 11 at 2:24
    
The best advice I have on that can be found at Tips for editing a question to make it suitable for re-opening. And seriously, thanks for not taking it personally! –  David Stratton Mar 11 at 2:59
    
You could also ask questions about framing this specific question here: meta.christianity.stackexchange.com instead of asking in the comments ;) –  The Freemason Mar 11 at 17:43
    
Gotta VTC this, I'd like to answer it from a Catholic perspective because I've heard an interesting explanation in the Theology of the Body. But since you're not asking for something that can be definitively answered within a particular theological framework, it's not useful for people to answer the question. –  Peter Turner Mar 11 at 17:45

3 Answers 3

up vote 2 down vote accepted

The Bible is silent on why Adam chose as he did, though there is much speculation on the subject.

One conjecture that comes up from time to time is fear. In the early accounts of creation, God judges nearly everything to be good, except one: for Man to be alone. Adam had endured this before Eve came, and although he did not see Eve drop dead on the spot, he knew she would die, and he would be alone again.

What did he hope to accomplish by eating the fruit? No one knows. He had not heard the serpent's lies, so it doesn't seem likely that he would have been motivated by them. Perhaps it was a form of lovers' suicide: he chose to die with her, rather than be left alone. Or maybe he thought that that if God were faced with the prospect of losing His only two humans, He might change His mind. Nothing in the Bible says either way. But in any event, rather than simply have faith in God to somehow make things right, he chose to go with Eve, rather than go with God, and thus he Fell.

This is, of course, nothing but speculation. There's nothing to support or refute it. But it's a fun question.

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks for the answer! –  user10330 Mar 14 at 4:24
    
I guess I'll have to go with this for now as it seems I can't really find official theological positions on this. Thanks, anyway! –  user10330 Mar 14 at 4:27

I cannot see how this question can ever be answered according to any Scripture I know. The only inference I can draw to a possible answer is that without knowing good from evil, unless Adam were with Eve when the Serpent deceived her; he might not know that that fruit his wife gave him was the forbidden fruit. otherwise like all men we know to just eat what our wives prepare for us and keep our mouths shut. one other remote answer would be that he didn't want woman to be smarter than man, at which he may not have succeeded anyway.

share|improve this answer
    
I guess you're right, thanks! –  user10330 Mar 14 at 4:25

What are the major views on Adam's motivation to sin given that he was not deceived?

According to Genesis 3:6, after the woman had eaten, she offered the fruit to her husband who was with her. I see here only a change in panorama, not a change in chronology. Adam had been standing there the entire time. He heard it all, he saw it all. If we look at the first part of verse 6, a possible answer reveals itself.

And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat... (AV)

We are told that the woman "saw" three things concerning the tree:

  1. It was good for food;
  2. It was pleasant to the eyes;
  3. It was a tree to be desired to make one wise.

To begin with, the woman was motivated by what she now "saw," not by what God had previously declared. And what she saw appealed to the bodily senses and carnal desires. It is no coincidence that a serpent is seen beguiling the woman. That the serpent ("the poisoner") was the mouthpiece of Satan is commonly understood. And in a very real way, here the serpent "poisoned" the thinking of the woman and her husband, "who was with her."

Though no reference is made to what Adam "saw" in the tree, we do have one clear fact revealed to us in Scripture—

...and he did eat.

Irrespective of what Adam did or did not see with regard to the tree, what he DID see was that the woman had eaten of the forbidden fruit and "was not dead." Regardless of Adam's position with regard to the tree, he was still motivated by what he "saw" in stark contrast to what God had declared and commanded. Thus, Adam's motivation to sin was the fact that he did not see the woman fall down dead. Which brings up an interesting point.

Numbers chapter 30 deals in part with the making of vows and swearing of oaths which bind a man or woman. Beginning with verse 6 we read—

And if she had at all an husband, when she vowed, or uttered ought out of her lips, wherewith she bound her soul; 7 And her husband heard it, and held his peace at her in the day that he heard it: then her vows shall stand, and her bonds wherewith she bound her soul shall stand. 8 But if her husband disallowed her on the day that he heard it; then he shall make her vow which she vowed, and that which she uttered with her lips, wherewith she bound her soul, of none effect: and the LORD shall forgive her. (AV)

These are the words of the LORD which Moses, in turn, conveyed to Israel. I submit that there is little difference, if indeed there is any at all, between an oath that binds one's soul and a deed which does so.

Here we have God's own declaration that if the husband hears (or hears and sees) what his wife does which is contrary to God's declaration, command, statute, edict, law, precept, etc., then the man has full authority to disallow what was said or done by the woman (wife) and, "...the LORD shall forgive her."

I see no reason to strip Adam of this caliber of authority. He would have been well within his sphere of authority and dominion over the serpent in disallowing the "act" of the woman, and to give the serpent the "left foot of fellowship" from the garden. In so doing he would have upheld the command of God both in regard to the "fruit" and in regard to "having dominion."

share|improve this answer
    
"Adam's motivation to sin was the fact that he did not see the woman fall down dead." This motivation of Adam's is conjecture, even though he did not see her dead. Matter of fact, if he thought it was OK to eat because she did not die immediately, then he was deceived! –  Steve Mar 12 at 13:16
    
Thanks for the answer! I thought maybe there were a few major official positions from the church fathers, or similar, on this but thanks anyway. –  user10330 Mar 14 at 4:26

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.