Christianity Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for committed Christians, experts in Christianity and those interested in learning more. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Concerning the end of the world and when this will happen Mark 13:10 says:

And the gospel must first be preached to all nations. (NIV)

Has the gospel been preached to all nations?

share|improve this question
1  
Nations like China and Iran still don't have Christianity flowing through them. I would probably suggest it hasn't yet. – Matt Jan 12 '14 at 18:50
4  
Primarily opinion-based. – Double U Jan 12 '14 at 19:00
1  
In terms of Bible translations, only about 300 million people in the world speak a language in which the Bible has not been translated at least in part. That is less than 5% of the world's population. So, I would say every nation has been reached, but not every tribe or tongue, at least not yet. – Narnian Jan 13 '14 at 18:55
1  
@Narnian,With the technology we have available etc,If you take an educated guess,how long would you think before every tribe and language hear the gospel? 5,10,20, 40, 50 years? – 77 Clash Jan 13 '14 at 19:13
1  
@77Clash I would estimate at least by the end of this century. See answer here: christianity.stackexchange.com/questions/16150/… – Narnian Jan 13 '14 at 20:24
up vote 2 down vote accepted
+100

I think there is general agreement on terms. Preaching the gospel can be verbal and does not require the Bible to be published in every language and dialect. Mark 13:10 was a command to the apostles decades before the gospel first appeared in written form. The apostles did not understand this command to mean 'published', or they would have rushed out and written a gospel immediately. 'Nations' is to be read as understood in the first century: as ethnic groups, not as political entities, and presumably not as individual towns or local communities.

Colossians 1:23 says the gospel has been preached all over the world, to everyone under heaven, but clearly this was not yet true, because the author of Colossians was only aware of the Mediterranean/Near Eastern world. The author of Colossians tells us that the gospel had been preached to all nations within that geographically limited world, so his is the meaning I would use for 'preach'.

The Joshua Project shows numerous communities as 'unreached' even in Europe, United States and Australia (including two of Australia's biggest cities). The Joshua Project definition of unreached can not mean that there are so many places where the gospel has never been preached, even if only on a street corner or in a house. The International Mission Board estimates are likewise measures of success, not of preaching. I do not see in Jesus' statement in Mark 13:10, a command to the apostles to preach to all nations, that the gospel must be accepted and believed by a substantial proportion of each ethnic group. It seems that Jesus' command is fulfilled by having preached the gospel, even if people choose not to believe.

Colossians tells us that the gospel had been preached all over the Mediterranean/Near Eastern world by around the middle of the first century, although we know the great majority of people had never personally heard the gospel. By the same standard, the gospel has now been preached all over the entire world.

share|improve this answer
    
I think you're right that Mark 13:10 doesn't suggest that people much accept the gospel in every ethnic group, but I'd note that the IMB's "unengaged" definition is exactly about ethnic groups which it is believed that no one has ever preached the gospel to. – curiousdannii Dec 6 '15 at 0:06
1  
@curiousdannii I take your point and credit you with finding this reference in the first place, but see this definition differently: "A people group is engaged when a church planting strategy, consistent with Evangelical faith and practice, is underway". /cont – Dick Harfield Dec 6 '15 at 0:43
1  
... cont/ 1) "A church planting strategy" is (to me) a step beyond having preached to a nation; such a strategy implies a) that the gospel has been preached; b) that there is enough interest (success) to develop this strategy. 2) "Consistent with Evangelical faith and practice" is restrictive - it would mean, for example, that many South American communities, being entirely Roman Catholic, would be judged "unreached." 3) There seems to be an emphasis on local community (people groups), which is fine for the IMB strategy, but here we are talking "nations." – Dick Harfield Dec 6 '15 at 0:45
    
Yeah the evangelical requirement is stricter than it should be. But I think their definition of ethnic people groups is still appropriate. – curiousdannii Dec 6 '15 at 2:41

No.

The word translated 'nations' is ἔθνος (ethnos), from which we derive the word 'ethnic'. It is talking about ethnic communities, which we might call people groups today, not political states.

The Joshua Project estimates that there are 16,825 people groups in the word. Of those, 7,287 are unreached, by which they mean "less than 2% Evangelical Christian and less than 5% Christian Adherents". Because there are so few Christians in an unreached people group they will struggle to evangelise their own group with the gospel, which means many Christians believe they need outside missionary help. This represents 2.91 billion people.

The International Mission Board estimates there are 2,945 unengaged people groups. An unengaged people group is one where there are no Christian in the group, and no plan for anyone to take the gospel to them. They estimate there are over 190 million people in unengaged people groups.

share|improve this answer
    
I like International Mission Board's definition of "unreached" a lot better than Joshua Project's. The latter seem to be creating definitions of reached and unreached totally out of thin air. – Nicolás Carlo Jan 14 '14 at 3:36
    
They look the same to me? JP: "The original Joshua Project editorial committee selected the criteria less than 2% Evangelical Christian and less than 5% Christian Adherents." IMB: "A people group is unreached when the number of Evangelical Christians is less than 2% of its population." – curiousdannii Jan 14 '14 at 3:40
1  
I think they're reasonable definitions. Would you call the Bengali Shaikh people reached if they had 1 Christian out of 218 million? 10 Christians? 1000? 1 million? This is a huge people group and they live in a large area, so even if there were 1 million Christians it is likely that many of the remaining 217 million people wouldn't have any contact with them. 2% is arbitrary, but it's a good approximation of how big a Christian community needs to be in order to be a significant rather than an insignificant minority. – curiousdannii Jan 14 '14 at 3:51
1  
Yes but that's really exactly the point. Evangelisation always needs to keep happening. The issue is whether a people group needs a lot of help or not. Because people from the same group are usually more effective evangelists and because there are only limited resources it is wise for us to send missionaries to those who need it most. These mission agencies use these definitions of reached and unengaged to help them strategise how to use their resources (people and money) most effectively so that every person on the planet will hear the gospel, whether through a local preacher or a missionary. – curiousdannii Jan 14 '14 at 4:18
1  
If you'd said that I would have agreed! Yes they made up a definition, and it's a very useful one for what they do. And personally, it's a useful definition for me too - I pray regularly using the Joshua Project's Unreached People Group of the Day app. – curiousdannii Jan 14 '14 at 4:22

I believe this was fulfilled. In Col. 1:23, the apostle Paul wrote,

If you remain in the faith grounded and settled, and be not moved away from the hope of the gospel which you heard, which was preached among every creature which is under heaven, of which, I Paul, was made a minister

εἴγε ἐπιμένετε τῇ πίστει τεθεμελιωμένοι καὶ ἑδραῖοι καὶ μὴ μετακινούμενοι ἀπὸ τῆς ἐλπίδος τοῦ εὐαγγελίου οὗ ἠκούσατε τοῦ κηρυχθέντος ἐν πάσῃ τῇ κτίσει τῇ ὑπὸ τὸν οὐρανόν οὗ ἐγενόμην ἐγὼ Παῦλος διάκονος

At least, if you choose to believe it was fulfilled, you have a biblical justification for doing so.

share|improve this answer
    
And yet, if it had already been preached to every creature, why did Paul need to be made a servant for it? This is probably more of a question for the Hermeneutics site, but I wonder what 'preached' in this verse really refers to? I suspect its more talking about the event of the resurrection than evangelism. – curiousdannii Jan 13 '14 at 3:12
    
What Mark 13:10 says, followed by what Mark 16:15 says, is the same thing that Paul said occurred (past tense) in Col. 1:23. "Every creature" simply means "among all the nations." I mean, if Paul declared that the gospel had been preached among every creature, doesn't that include every nation? :) There's no way around it. :) – H3br3wHamm3r81 Jan 13 '14 at 3:26
    
But sometimes the same words are used in different ways, such as the supposed conflict between Paul and James. I don't dispute that the same words are used here, but I do wonder if Mark and Paul mean different things by them. I think it's fair to ask what Paul means because we know that he didn't preach the gospel in Australia or the Americas... – curiousdannii Jan 13 '14 at 3:30
    
See also Rom. 10:18: But I say, "Have they not heard? Yes verily! Their sound went into all the earth, and their words unto the ends of the world." – H3br3wHamm3r81 Jan 13 '14 at 3:33
3  
I don't think "I believe..." makes for a very good answer here. – Flimzy Dec 3 '15 at 20:06

Prominent dispensationalist John MacArthur understands this passage to be a prophecy that will be fulfilled in the future, but not primarily through the church's work of evangelism. Instead, his literal approach to Revelation indicates to him that immediately prior to the outpouring of the bowl judgments (Revelation 16), God will send an angel to "supernaturally present the gospel to every person on earth":

6 Then I saw another angel flying directly overhead, with an eternal gospel to proclaim to those who dwell on earth, to every nation and tribe and language and people. 7 And he said with a loud voice, “Fear God and give him glory, because the hour of his judgment has come, and worship him who made heaven and earth, the sea and the springs of water.” (Revelation 14:6–7, ESV)

MacArthur argues:

That will be the final and total evangelization of the world, miraculously proclaimed from heaven. After that proclamation man's day will be finished [...] and his opportunity for salvation will be over.


MacArthur New Testament Commentary on Matthew 24:14

share|improve this answer
    
Revelation 5:9-would appear to be saying that it is not only Nations that have been reached! New International Version: And they sang a new song, saying: "You are worthy to take the scroll and to open its seals, because you were slain, and with your blood you purchased for God persons from every TRIBE and LANGUAGE and PEOPLE and NATION.This happens before Revelation 14:6-7 – 77 Clash Dec 7 '15 at 15:15

Before even trying to unravel the mystery behind Jesus statement in Mark 13:10 we need to first determine just what and who Jesus meant. The two key words here are published and nations.

King James translation

Mark 13:10 And the gospel must first be published among all nations.

Greek Orthodox

10 καὶ εἰς πάντα τὰ ἔθνη δεῖ πρῶτον ι κηρυχθῆνα τὸ εὐαγγέλιον.

Definitions of the Greek words:

  1. ἔθνος

ethnos (eth'-nos) n.

  1. a race (as of the same habit), i.e. a tribe

  2. (specially) a foreign (non-Jewish) one, Gentiles

  3. (usually, by implication) pagan

KJV: Gentile, heathen, nation, people

  1. κηρύσσω

kerusso (kay-roos'-so) v.

  1. to herald (as a public crier), especially divine truth (the gospel)

KJV: preacher(-er), proclaim, publish

Since Jesus spoke Aramaic and the Gospels were written in Greek we can not know for certainty these are accurate meanings, but since Greek is a verb oriented language, the meanings must be very near exact.

So We can say with assurance that what Jesus was saying is that the Gospel must be proclaimed to all tribes, which also would be all languages.

So how many languages are there?

Ethnologue (published by SIL International), whose detailed classified list as of 2009 included 6,909 distinct languages.

Much pioneering work in documenting the languages of the world has been done by missionary organizations (such as the Summer Institute of Linguistics, now known as SIL International) with an interest in translating the Christian Bible. As of 2009, at least a portion of the bible had been translated into 2,508 different languages, still a long way short of full coverage.

I may be wrong, but as I see it that Scripture will be fulfilled when the Bible is translated into all those languages and presented to them.

Much translation has been done since 2009, but I am unsure how many are left to be translated and published.

share|improve this answer
    
Beckham,so are you saying that the word has not been preached to all nations? – 77 Clash Jan 12 '14 at 20:53
1  
@ 77 Clash you are misreading Mark 13:10 it does not say "preached" it says κηρύσσω which is more accurately translated"published" than preached. I do not know which Jesus was referring too, but the list of languages I referred to was compiled by Missionaries and since they are in the business of spreading the Gospel I am inclined to believe that they preached it as they were compiling the list. As I said I may be wrong but that is my belief. anyone is welcome to either disagree or agree as they are led. – BYE Jan 12 '14 at 21:53
    
Beckham,I see what you mean.I think the internet will be a "big player." – 77 Clash Jan 12 '14 at 22:26
1  
κηρύσσω and εὐαγγελίζω. Both can be translated and understood as "preached," as in orally proclaimed. κηρύσσω emphasizes the action (proclaimed), while εὐαγγελίζω emphasizes the object (what is proclaimed), that being, good news. Matt 3:1 - In those days came John the Baptist, preaching in the wilderness of Judaea. You're not trying to tell me that John was publishing scrolls in the wilderness of Judaea, are you??? – H3br3wHamm3r81 Jan 12 '14 at 22:40
    
@ H3br3wHamm3r81 Of course not my point is that that word in most of Mark, Matthew and Luke, is translated preached and here it is curiously translated published. In some other translations it is even translated as proclaimed, and given in Mark 13:10. I was as I noted giving my PERSONAL opinion and not trying to force it on anyone. – BYE Jan 12 '14 at 23:15

Colossians 1:6 (GOD'S WORD® Translation)

This Good News is present with you now. It is producing results and spreading all over the world as it did among you from the first day you heard it.

Colossians 1:23 (New Living Translation)

The Good News has been preached all over the world

share|improve this answer
1  
@curiousdannii excuse me. 61AD was a reference to Paul, 84 NIV Referencere says he wrote Colossians in about 60AD. But if you want to get technical only Romans, 1 & 2 Corinthians, and Galatians are UNDISPUTED Paul epistles, called Hauptebriefe. Next time edit it out if you dont like it. – WelcomeNewUsers Jan 15 '14 at 2:32
    
I didn't dislike it, I just didn't know what you were referring to. I wondered if there was some event that happened then. – curiousdannii Jan 15 '14 at 2:35

While word translated 'nations' is ἔθνος (ethnos) is the word from which we derive the word 'ethnic', according to the Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature, this word is defined as "body of persons united by kinship, culture, and common traditions", the Lexicon tells us it should be translated as Nation or People in this context (it can also be translated as Gentiles) and the majority of the translations cited are "Nation".

Strong's Concordance agrees and records that this word is translated as "nation" or "nations" 67 times and "people" or "pagans" only 3 times.

Operating under the assumption that the translators knew what they were doing and translated this correctly, yes - the Gospel has been preached to every nation.

The Jesus Film Project reports

The film has been seen in every country of the world and translated into hundreds of languages since its initial release in 1979.

Through use by The JESUS Film Project, and more than 1,500 Christian agencies, this powerful film has had several billion viewings worldwide since 1979. On top of that, the great majority of those heard the story of Jesus in a language they easily understand.

As a result, more than More than 200 million people have indicated decisions to accept Christ as their personal Savior and Lord.

This film depicts the life, ministry and death of Jesus - the Gospel.

According to the project, the film is available in 1390 languages (currently) with more added every year. A complete list can be found here.

Because the film has been shown in every country in the world, the Gospel has therefore been preached to every nation.

share|improve this answer
    
-1 Nation != nation state. The idea of a nation state/country did not exist in the time of the NT, so it couldn't possibly be what the verse is referring to. – curiousdannii Dec 10 '15 at 10:53
    
If the idea did not exist then, it certainly does now. Yet the translators still choose to translate as "Nation" and not "Nation State". As I said, I am presuming for the sake of this answer that they knew what they were doing. – James Shewey Dec 10 '15 at 15:20
    
But that's exactly my point. They translated it as "nation" - ie the 16 thousand or so ethnic people groups, not the 206 sovereign states. So while the Jesus film is definitely widely disseminated, its being shown in every country doesn't mean that it's been shown to every nation. – curiousdannii Dec 10 '15 at 15:30

No. According to the Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature,

One valid translation of this word is "Gentile" and Strong's Concordance records that it is translated this way in 93 of 163 appearances. Threfore, this word should more likely be translated as Gentile.

Since the Gospel has not been preached to every Gentile, the requirement of Mark 13:10 has not been filled.

share|improve this answer
    
Related question – James Shewey Dec 10 '15 at 10:18

protected by David Oct 25 '14 at 13:26

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site.

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.