Christianity Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for committed Christians, experts in Christianity and those interested in learning more. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I've heard popular retellings of the Lutheran view of pope as Antichrist that range from:

  • a delusion that Pope Leo X was the incarnate figure of prophecy, to
  • a slur (like calling George Washington a communist), to
  • a conviction that it's a simple statement of the doctrine of justification: no one is "ante" (stands before, between Christ and sinner) in the mechanism of salvation

A previous question focused on the role of prophecy in the idea. But my question is to what extent this concept is not a mere slur but rather a necessary consequence of the doctrine of justification. Both bases may offend, but one is unavoidable consequence of there being two different denominations. Quotes from Reformers and prominent Lutheran theologians are of interest.

share|improve this question
up vote 6 down vote accepted

Despite my love for Martin Luther and the doctrine of justification, I believe the answer to your question is (for the most part) yes.

While I don't believe that most modern Lutherans believe that the Pope is the Antichrist, Martin Luther did say it as a criticism of papal supremacy and the sale of indulgences. So as you put it, a conviction that it's a simple statement of the doctrine of justification: no one is "ante" (stands before, between Christ and sinner) in the mechanism of salvation might be most correct for the original view held by Luther himself.

"This teaching [of the supremacy of the pope] shows forcefully that the Pope is the very Antichrist, who has exalted himself above, and opposed himself against Christ, because he will not permit Christians to be saved without his power, which, nevertheless, is nothing, and is neither ordained nor commanded by God." --Martin Luther

Some Lutherans may still have strong views regarding the Pope, but most do not. The WELS webpage about this topic may give you additional insights into the view of some Confessional Lutherans, or at least some within WELS.

share|improve this answer

From what I had read in Roland Bainton's "Here I Stand", there were strong emotions between Luther, his followers, the Catholics and the Vatican. The very concept of secularizing and commercializing the Catholic Church and its belief system (i.e. selling indulgences) brought the money-changers, dressed as the clergy, into the temple. The Pope, being the head of the Church and condoning this activity, was seen by Luther as the Antichrist. This in itself would have also compelled Luther to write his 95 Theses.

share|improve this answer
Welcome, and nice answer! Thanks for contributing. One thing that would be helpful would be to provide the relevant chapter/page numbers in Here I Stand. If you haven't already done so, I hope you'll take a minute to take the tour and learn how this site is different from others. – Nathaniel Feb 17 at 21:29
Welcome to Christianity.SE, and thanks for offering an answer. For some tips on writing good answers here, please see: What makes a good supported answer? – Lee Woofenden Feb 17 at 21:40
Your chronology is a bit off on Luther. He still had hope of reforming the Church and getting the Pope's support when he wrote the 95 Theses. His later conclusions on the Pope as Antichrist had no bearing at that time. – Joshua Feb 17 at 22:09

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.