Christianity Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for committed Christians, experts in Christianity and those interested in learning more. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Two films, each called Pope Joan one in 1972 and one in 2009 repeat an old legend about a female Pope. What is the nature of this theory, and is there anything to substantiate it?

share|improve this question
Hi Marc, welcome to Christianity.SE. Could you edit your question and provide a link to "that film," or an explanation of the controversy surrounding Pope Joan, for the benefit of users who are not already familiar with the subject? Thanks. – Mason Wheeler Oct 3 '13 at 17:05
Welcome to C.SE! When you get the chance, please check out our tour and specifically How we are different than other sites. One thing in particular - we don't look for opinions here, we look for fact, so I'm editing your question a little bit. Also, we encourage perspectives from all quarters, so I'm sure you're offending someone, but the best policy is not to care :) – Affable Geek Oct 3 '13 at 17:17
Do you mean this film? – Bruce Alderman Oct 3 '13 at 17:17
Yes Bruce that's the one. And thank you Affable Geek for the wonderful words. – Marc P Gangmei Oct 3 '13 at 17:26

Most scholars dismiss this is as fiction. Indeed the Catholic Encyclopedia brings up multiple variations on the story, each of which can be easily debunked.

Perhaps the most damning proof that this is a legend would stem from the fact that nobody - including enemies at the time - ever made such accusations. From Wikipedia:

It is also notable that enemies of the papacy in the 9th century make no mention of a female pope. For example, Photios I of Constantinople, who became Patriarch in 858 and was deposed by Pope Nicholas I in 863, was an enemy of the pope. He vehemently asserted his own authority as patriarch over that of the pope in Rome, and would have made the most of any scandal of that time regarding the papacy; but he never mentions the story once in any of his voluminous writings. Indeed, at one point he mentions "Leo and Benedict, successively great priests of the Roman Church".

This book is a book dedicated entirely to dealing with all the variations on the story, and debunking each.

share|improve this answer
Thanks Affable Geek for the link to the book (mean a lot). I don't know what happen to my Google Search. lol – Marc P Gangmei Oct 3 '13 at 17:30

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.