Take the 2-minute tour ×
Christianity Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for committed Christians, experts in Christianity and those interested in learning more. It's 100% free, no registration required.

This question already has an answer here:

Jesus came to Earth or was born roughly 2000 years ago. At least 500 years earlier, there were civilizations in the Middle Eastern / Near Eastern region that could carve the faces of their kings and queens on stones. So, why does no one know what Jesus looks like?

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by Daи, fredsbend, David Stratton, Caleb Sep 29 '13 at 14:31

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

    
    
Well, there is this documentary called Who was Jesus?, and it sort of explains what Jesus may have looked out based on geographical clues and the people of that time and place. –  Anonymous Sep 20 '13 at 4:27
2  
For one,Jesus wasn't a king. –  Juann Strauss Sep 20 '13 at 7:54
3  
This reminds me of the little boy in Sunday School who was drawing. His teacher asked what he was drawing. He replied that he was drawing a picture of Jesus. Seeing a teachable moment, the teacher told the boy that no one knew what Jesus looked like, to which the young boy replied, "Yes, I know, but they will after I'm done with this picture..." –  Narnian Sep 20 '13 at 12:08
add comment

1 Answer 1

Civilisations have to put a lot of effort into recording images. It's only rulers and powerful or politically-influential people who get their portraits painted or made into some other reasonably-permanent physical form.

That's true today: how many portraits are there of the British Queen, for example [on every coin and banknote and many many more] compared to Joe Bloggs? Even if Joe lives in a nice house, or is a Member of Parliament, far fewer. In this internet age, there are many images of media celebrities, but even they are mainly digitally stored and don't exist in a permanent form like a sculpture.

Jesus wasn't a ruler. He was an itinerant preacher. If there were any portraits of him they were likely to be on Wanted posters; even if his disciples had painted portraits they would have been on ephemeral materials.

The theological reason that there are no images is that what he looked like is not important. In fact it could be counterproductive. It's what Jesus did and what he said which are important, and they were certainly remembered and written down for posterity.

Jesus is the epitome of being "all things to all men" (1 Cor 9:22) — because there is no contemporary image, we are free to imagine him as we will so that what he tells us is relevant to us and not limited to those in some far-off place who happen to look like him.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.