Take the 2-minute tour ×
Christianity Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for committed Christians, experts in Christianity and those interested in learning more. It's 100% free, no registration required.

In mid-Acts dispensationalism (a form of hyperdispensationalism), it is taught that only Paul's writings (from Romans to Philemon) are applicable to the church today and that the other parts of the Bible are informational only.

What, specifically, is the logical basis for this position?

share|improve this question
1  
I have my doubts about whether mid-Acts dispensationalists actually believe that; it seems like they would accept Revelation and John's epistles as well. Do you have evidence for this? –  Mr. Bultitude Apr 26 at 19:25

2 Answers 2

Marcionism is the main heresy (read: deviation from mainline) that promotes the supremacy of Paul's writings. It's similar to Gnosticism in that it presents the Old Testament God and Jesus as separate, rival, entities. The logical basis for the belief is that there are contradictions between God and Jesus. Those contradictions prove that Jesus was sent by a different God. Anything that relied on the Old Testament was also wrong: the 4 gospels that are cannon today, the pastoral epistles and the letter to the Hebrews.

There's an answer on your other question that explains this pretty well.

share|improve this answer
    
Hyperdispensationalists are not Marcionites, at least not in the strict sense. They don't believe Jesus and the Old Testament God to be different; they merely take traditional dispensationalism to an extreme and state that God only intends a certain subset of Scripture to apply to today's church. –  Mr. Bultitude Apr 26 at 19:19

I think the logical basis comes from saying we are in the 'church age' so only the writings of Paul about the rules for this age are 'directly relevant'. Other parts of the bible obviously help us to read the writings of Paul correctly.

See the table in this link for a summary of the different ages: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dispensationalism

The logic is:

  1. 'the fall'= we thought we could do it all ourselves
  2. 'the law' = a way to live that would bring blessings upon God's people (but with only a few like Moses, Joshua and David being filled with God's spirit)
  3. 'pentecost' = through the actions of Jesus we are all able to be filled with Gods spirit and walk humbly in the spirit to do God's work.

As we are in the 'Church Age' and able to be filled with the God's spirit some people say Paul's writings argue there are no rules except that we walk humbly in the spirit seeking to do God's will. However, Paul's writings would also suggest we need to work at this and be subject to church discipline when we start failing to show the fruits of the spirit (depending on the church this might be through greed, sexual immorality, envy, gossip etc as shown in Paul's writings to various churches he had helped establish).

I think I would be with most Christians in thinking that all the books of the Bible have been recognised as being written by people with -at the very least- some great wisdom and understanding of the nature of God. However, logically speaking, some books are more directly relevant to our present lives than others.

share|improve this answer
    
Welcome to Christianity.SE! I hope you'll spend some time browsing the questions and answers here. Thanks also for offering an answer. Does this answer represent the views of a particular church or denomination that you belong to? Christianity.SE is more about the beliefs of whole groups of Christians than about individual views. For some tips on writing good answers, please see: What makes a good supported answer? –  Lee Woofenden yesterday
    
Welcome to the site. This answer is okay. Some corroborating sources would make it better. Can you edit some in? –  fredsbend 10 hours ago

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.