Christianity Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for committed Christians, experts in Christianity and those interested in learning more. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

How did the Crusades affect the King's power/authority, during and after the Crusades?

share|improve this question

closed as off-topic by Flimzy, James T, Affable Geek, fredsbend, Narnian Nov 13 '13 at 14:08

  • This question does not appear to be about Christianity within the scope defined in the help center.
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

I think this is more of a History question than a Christianity question. Even then, there may be so many ways that the Crusades can affect the King's power. – Double U Sep 7 '13 at 3:59
I think this is on topic and an interesting question that could be addressed with a high-level overview. – David Sep 7 '13 at 4:21
Which king are you referring to? There were dozens of kings affected by the Crusades.. – user5286 Sep 7 '13 at 15:14
Is this already sufficiently answered, implicitly, by the section on kings in my answer to your other question? – James T Sep 27 '13 at 19:29
This question appears to be off-topic because it is about political history, not Christianity. – Flimzy Nov 8 '13 at 15:44

They helped to break down feudalism by increasing the authority of kings.

  • Some nobles died in battle without leaving an heir. Their lands passed to the king.
  • Some nobles sold their land in an effort to raise money to pay the special tax levied by the king to offset the cost of the crusades.
  • Some nobles gave their serfs a chance to buy their freedom in an effort to raise money they needed to buy armor and weapons
  • Some young men who could buy their way out of feudal obligation joined the crusades. Many died. That reduced the work force. If a farm failed, it passed to the king.
share|improve this answer
It's worth commenting that forfeiture to the Crown was (is!) a feature of English law. – Andrew Leach Nov 8 '13 at 11:15
Welcome to the site! This next has nothing to do with the quality of your answer, it's just standard to help new visitors avoid misunderstanding the site (as I did at first.) As a new visitor, I'd recommend checking out the following two posts, which are meant to help newcomers "learn the ropes": help page and How we are different than other sites? – David Nov 8 '13 at 12:38

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.