Take the 2-minute tour ×
Christianity Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for committed Christians, experts in Christianity and those interested in learning more. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Randy Alcorn claims in his book Heaven (page 374) that animals have souls, though not necessarily like humans. Is there any Biblical support for this?

share|improve this question
    
As far as I'm aware, the mainstream religions (Catholic, Anglican, Lutheran, Orthodox, etc) agree that animals don't go to heaven. Not sure what that says about the presence of a soul though. –  Mark Henderson Aug 24 '11 at 0:54
    
Alcorn also claims that particular animals (e.g. pets) might go to Heaven, but that would be two questions... –  El'endia Starman Aug 24 '11 at 0:56
1  
This is heavily bound up in the definition of a "soul". Many consider having a soul quite distinct from having a spirit or, that is, having a soul which carries the image of God via the breath received by Adam and therefore being a spiritual being. Having a soul in it's most basic form may be nothing more than the ability to form relationships and bonds. –  Lawrence Dol Aug 24 '11 at 2:47
    
There's a whole spiral of questions here: if animals are created by God and are incapable of sin, why would they not be allowed into heaven? I'm not aware of any commentary about this in the Bible because I don't think it is a question which would have even occurred to the Biblical writers. (Which gets into questions about Biblical authorship… and down and down it spirals…) –  TJ Luoma Oct 12 '11 at 5:21
    
@TJLuoma: Wait...animals are incapable of sin? Interesting... –  El'endia Starman Oct 12 '11 at 5:30
show 2 more comments

4 Answers 4

up vote 16 down vote accepted

In the Bible, the word for "spirit" is the same as "breathe." But there is ultimately a difference between the life of humans and the life in animals.

In Genesis 2:7, God breathes into the nostrils of man and gives him life, but all land animals have this same breath as well. "And they went in unto Noah into the ark, two and two of all flesh, wherein is the breath of life." (Genesis 7:15 (KJV))

However, the distinction between the two types of spirits is apparent in the following verses:

Nevertheless man being in honour abideth not: he is like the beasts that perish.This their way is their folly: yet their posterity approve their sayings. Selah.Like sheep they are laid in the grave; death shall feed on them; and the upright shall have dominion over them in the morning; and their beauty shall consume in the grave from their dwelling. But God will redeem my soul from the power of the grave: for he shall receive me. Selah. Psa 49:12-15 (KJV)

Nevertheless man being in honour abideth not: he is like the beasts that perish. Ecc. 3:21 (KJV)

It is clear that God does care for the animals. In many passages, God shows compassion for the beast or bird, whether by the law, or other means. Though they do not have eternal souls, they are part of God's creation, and they give Him His due worship.

share|improve this answer
1  
The Bible was written in many languages. Are you saying that "spirit" and "breathe" are the same in Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek? –  Flimzy Oct 12 '11 at 5:53
1  
Yes. ru'ach in Hebrew is both life, breath, spirit, and soul. –  Affable Geek Jan 13 '12 at 18:32
    
And pneuma in Greek is both "breath" and "spirit". –  Joe May 31 '12 at 16:46
    
@Flimzy: The English spirit is related to the Latin spirare, to breathe. Think of Dum spiro, spero (while I breathe, I hope), so you could say that, in English, spirit could've meant both breath and soul at some point in history –  Elias Van Ootegem Dec 27 '13 at 10:22
    
@EliasVanOotegem: You could say that, but I'm pretty sure you would be wrong. You've also muddied the conversation further by bringing in the separate concept of "soul." –  Flimzy Dec 27 '13 at 11:28
show 2 more comments

I think the fundamental difference between the animals and humans is not the soul, but the presence of a spirit. I think that distinction can be derived from Genesis 1 (KJV):

24And God said, "Let the earth bring forth living creatures according to their kinds—livestock and creeping things and beasts of the earth according to their kinds." And it was so. 25And God made the beasts of the earth according to their kinds and the livestock according to their kinds, and everything that creeps on the ground according to its kind. And God saw that it was good.

26Then God said, "Let us make man in our image, after our likeness. And let them have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the heavens and over the livestock and over all the earth and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth."

27So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them.

In verses 24-25, God describes his creation of the animals...that he made the animals "according to their kind". In verses 26-27, God describes his creation of man, and clearly delineates that man was made after HIS OWN IMAGE AND LIKENESS. The likeness of God is that of an eternal being with a spirit, the Holy Spirit.

This distinction is made clearer in other passages, such as 1 Thessalonians 5:23 (KJV):

Now may the God of peace himself sanctify you completely, and may your whole spirit and soul and body be kept blameless at the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ.

Where the spirit is described separately from the soul. The spirit is also described in 1 Corinthians 2 (KJV):

12Now we have received, not the spirit of the world, but the Spirit who is from God, so that we may know the things freely given to us by God, 13 which things we also speak, not in words taught by human wisdom, but in those taught by the Spirit, combining spiritual thoughts with spiritual words. 14But a natural man does not accept the things of the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness to him; and he cannot understand them, because they are spiritually appraised. 15But he who is spiritual appraises all things, yet he himself is appraised by no one.

Which brings clarity to the purpose of a healthy, living spirit... It is the spirit that is rejuvenated or given to us when we are born again. It is our spirit that gives us the ability to commune with God via his Holy Spirit. It is the part of our being that, because it is in the likeness of God, allows us to commune with him. There are differences between different translations of the bible, and some seem to indicate that unsaved man does not have a spirit, while saved man does. I am unsure what that means, or which translations are accurate. However it is an intriguing state, one which may beg the question...are we no better than animals until we accept salvation from God? Are we simply more intelligent beings with a soul until the day we repent of our sins and ask God for forgiveness and eternal life in heaven? I am not educated in the word or its language roots enough to answer that question myself, so hopefully someone more versed than I am will come along and provide a more definitive answer.

Regarding animals, there is no reference to them having a spirit in the bible. It is intriguing to note, however, that animals are referenced at least once in Revelation (that I can think of):

Revelation 19:14 (KJV):

And the armies which were in heaven followed him upon white horses, clothed in fine linen, white and clean.

I do believe God cared for the animals, despite the difference between them and man. He gave mankind, the beings he created in his own image and likeness, his most cherished creation, dominion over the animals and the earth, so he must have cared for the animals. I cannot say for sure what the passage from revelation means, however it seems that there will be animals in heaven as well. Whether they are the resurrected/eternal souls of animals on earth, or new creations, I cannot say.

share|improve this answer
    
Jonah 4:11 and Luke 12:6 could help your case here. –  dleyva3 Aug 26 '11 at 0:06
2  
"Regarding animals, there is no reference to them having a spirit in the bible." - No, Eccl. 3:21 takes as an assumption that animals have spirits (though the sentence itself is an uncertainty about their properties as compared to human spirits). –  Muke Tever Feb 8 '12 at 14:16
add comment

Any Biblical support? Yes; the writer of Ecclesiastes takes it as a given (Ecclesiastes 3:21, ESV quoted):

Who knows whether the spirit of man goes upward and the spirit of the beast goes down into the earth?

Also, the book of Revelation appears to refer to creatures in the sea as living souls - some translations do say living things, but the Greek word is ψυχή "breath, soul, spirit" (Revelation 16:3, KJV quoted):

And the second angel poured out his vial upon the sea; and it became as the blood of a dead man: and every living soul died in the sea.

Either way, if animals do have souls, your author is right that they may differ in important ways from human souls.

What effect are you trying to observe when you ask whether animals have souls? Or what properties associated with the English word "soul" are you looking to find in animals? A better directed question will help quell the quibbles about definitions appearing in every other answer here.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Hebrews 4:12 indicates that the word of God is able to divide the soul and the spirit. From the Bible, we understand that humans are, if I may use the word, little "trinities". We have 1) a body, 2) a soul, and 3) a spirit. This is part of the way in which mankind is made "in the image of God."

It is the spiritual part of us that distinguishes us from the animals, so animals would only have a body and a soul, with the soul being the personality.

Lastly, plants are distinguished from animals, I believe, in that there is no soul. They only have the physical aspect of existence--the body.

share|improve this answer

This post does not cite any references or sources. Please help improve this post by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.

    
Interesting idea. Do you have any support? –  El'endia Starman Oct 10 '11 at 21:03
    
The trinity is not three parts of a whole, in the same way that body, soul, and spirit make up a human. So I think that analogy is inappropriate. Also, the distinction between plant and animal is not the existence or absence of a soul, but their cellular structure and metabolism.. Many microscopic animals I suspect do not have 'souls' in any meaningful way. –  Flimzy Oct 10 '11 at 21:14
    
If you were not a regular user, I might have deleted this answer right away. However, I'll give you a chance to edit and improve it to include references and/or sources. –  El'endia Starman Jul 3 at 20:25
add comment

protected by Community Sep 18 '12 at 19:22

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality answers, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site.

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.