Take the 2-minute tour ×
Christianity Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for committed Christians, experts in Christianity and those interested in learning more. It's 100% free, no registration required.

This article has a list of people burned as heretics by the Church in the past. Is there any Biblical basis for burning the heretics? Which specific verse was used for the judgement on the heretics, which called for the burning at the stake?

I guess, this verse might have influence on the method of execution, if interpreted wrongly.

“I am the vine; you are the branches. If you remain in me and I in you, you will bear much fruit; apart from me you can do nothing. If you do not remain in me, you are like a branch that is thrown away and withers; such branches are picked up, thrown into the fire and burned. (John 15:5-6)

Couldn't the Church simply ignore the heretics? Is there any command in the Bible to burn the heretics? If such command is there, should we continue to burn the heretics in the Church today?

share|improve this question
    
You have misunderstood "burned" in the scripture. It is not referring to a physical burning and so has no bearing on burning at the stakes. –  Waeshael Aug 9 '13 at 11:46
2  
@Waeshael On the contrary, that verse may indeed be exactly why burning was chosen as the punishment. –  Andrew Leach Aug 9 '13 at 11:53
1  
@Waeshael Or, you misunderstood the question? –  Mawia Aug 9 '13 at 11:55
    
Well, I have a problem with "heretics." Until the Roman Church established its Dogma, heretic meant other opinion (cf. Iranaeus writings 2nd. cent.). And in RC only RC clergy can be branded a heretic and then only if they do not teach from the entire magisterium. i.e they teach only a part of it. Non-Catholics could not be heretics. –  Waeshael Aug 9 '13 at 14:59
1  
I bet you might be able to find something along the lines of "purged by fire" or "cleansed by fire". Fire was (and sort of still is) symbolic of God's holy cleansing. I bet you could find something where a witch is sentenced to burn for the sake of her own soul, that the fire might purge her of all evil. –  fredsbend Aug 9 '13 at 18:41
show 6 more comments

3 Answers

up vote 10 down vote accepted

There is no verse in the New Testament stating that we need to punish "heretics". Quite the contrary.

In James 4:12 (NIV) it says:

There is only one Lawgiver and Judge, the one who is able to save and destroy. But you--who are you to judge your neighbor?

Matthew 5:43-48 (NIV):

"You have heard that it was said, ‘Love your neighbor and hate your enemy.’ But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, that you may be children of your Father in heaven. He causes his sun to rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the righteous and the unrighteous. If you love those who love you, what reward will you get? Are not even the tax collectors doing that? And if you greet only your own people, what are you doing more than others? Do not even pagans do that? Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect.

The parable of the tares among the wheat could be applied to this problem. Matthew 13:24-30 (NIV):

Jesus told them another parable: “The kingdom of heaven is like a man who sowed good seed in his field. But while everyone was sleeping, his enemy came and sowed weeds among the wheat, and went away. When the wheat sprouted and formed heads, then the weeds also appeared.

“The owner’s servants came to him and said, ‘Sir, didn’t you sow good seed in your field? Where then did the weeds come from?’

“‘An enemy did this,’ he replied.

“The servants asked him, ‘Do you want us to go and pull them up?’

“‘No,’ he answered, ‘because while you are pulling the weeds, you may uproot the wheat with them. Let both grow together until the harvest. At that time I will tell the harvesters: First collect the weeds and tie them in bundles to be burned; then gather the wheat and bring it into my barn.’”

Also, when Peter lopped off the ear of the slave of the high priest (Matthew 26:51-52), Jesus said:

"Put your sword back into its place; for all those who take up the sword shall perish by the sword."

I know that the context is different, but it shows how the kingdom of heaven is not a militant kingdom.

share|improve this answer
1  
So you mean the Church made a big mistake by burning the heretics? –  Mawia Aug 9 '13 at 15:17
    
Again we see that the gathering of people "to be burned" is to take place at the end of the world and is to be instigated by God. Though the "enemy" created the tares, Jesus taught that enemies were to be loved. Can God do any less? The burning is to purify their souls, not to destroy them. This applies to those alive or dead at the end of the world. –  Waeshael Aug 9 '13 at 15:29
    
+1 great answer Dan. –  HelloWorld Aug 9 '13 at 20:43
1  
@Waeshael Precisely. We are called to love our enemies. But, I'm not sure what you mean that the burning is to purify their souls. The lake of fire is meant for eternal punishment. –  Dan the Man Aug 9 '13 at 23:00
    
We are also called to judge no man on this earth. We are to treat those who refuse to understand, as a heathen man and a publican Mt 18:17 and welcome them into the kingdom of heaven, as sinners to begin their instruction anew. (As the Master taught, the publicans and harlots go into the kingdom of God before the unbelievers.) Mt 21:31. God came to baptize with the Holy Ghost and Fire Mt3:11. The fire is to purify us, as gold and silver are purified from the baser elements in the smelting of them. –  Waeshael Aug 10 '13 at 3:47
add comment

There's a scholarly article on the Inquisitions at a rather surprising website. It says...

(From Deuteronomy 13 NIV) "If a prophet, or one who foretells by dreams, appears among you... and he says, 'Let us follow other gods'... That prophet or dreamer must be put to death... You must purge the evil from among you.

If your very own brother, or your son or daughter, or the wife you love, or your closest friend secretly entices you, saying, 'Let us go and worship other gods'... do not yield to him or listen to him. Show him no pity. Do not spare him or shield him... You must certainly put him to death. Your hand must be the first in putting him to death, and then the hands of all the people. Stone him to death... Then all Israel will hear and be afraid, and no one among you will do such an evil thing again.

If you hear it said about one of the towns the LORD your God is giving you to live in that wicked men have arisen among you and have led the people of their town astray... then you must inquire, probe and investigate it thoroughly. And if it is true and it has been proved that this detestable thing has been done among you, you must certainly put to the sword all who live in that town. Destroy it completely, both its people and its livestock.

Gather all the plunder of the town into the middle of the public square and completely burn the town and all its plunder as a whole burnt offering to the LORD your God. It is to remain a ruin forever, never to be rebuilt."

(From Exodus 22:18 NIV) "Do not allow a sorceress to live."

It does appear that the only NT verse which could be used as justification is the one you cite from John 15. However, S Thomas Aquinas was happy with the situation of heretics being delivered for execution:

...Wherefore if forgers of money and other evil-doers are forthwith condemned to death by the secular authority, much more reason is there for heretics, as soon as they are convicted of heresy, to be not only excommunicated but even put to death.

On the part of the Church, however, there is mercy which looks to the conversion of the wanderer, wherefore she condemns not at once, but 'after the first and second admonition,' as the Apostle directs: after that, if he is yet stubborn, the Church no longer hoping for his conversion, looks to the salvation of others, by excommunicating him and separating him from the Church, and furthermore delivers him to the secular tribunal to be exterminated thereby from the world by death... Arius was but one spark in Alexandria, but as that spark was not at once put out, the whole earth was laid waste by its flame.

[Summa Theologica]

As to whether the Church should be acting in the same way today, what Aquinas says is relevant: "...and furthermore delivers him to the secular tribunal to be exterminated..."

Aquinas acknowledges that it is not the Church who is exterminating, but "the secular tribunal". People are put to death in accordance with the laws of the State, which may or may not allow execution for heresy against the Church. Most secular law nowadays does not.

With excommunication, the Church is protecting itself from pollution — both the Church Militant as the heretic will no longer have contact with it; and the Church Triumphant, as he won't reach heaven either.

The Church does still excommunicate for heresy.

share|improve this answer
    
One part of St. Thomas's comments that is often overlooked in the immediate shock of first encountering this passage is if forgers of money ... are ... condemned to death by the secular authority. Clearly the bar for capital punishment was MUCH lower in 13th-century Europe than it is almost anywhere today. –  Ben Dunlap Aug 9 '13 at 11:15
1  
Nice answer in general -- might be worth emphasizing earlier on that "the Church" did not historically do the executing. Also I would quibble with "Once their eternal soul is dealt with via excommunication" since the quote from St. Thomas seems to indicate that excommunication is aimed at the spiritual well-being of the rest of the flock and really has nothing directly to do with the eternal soul of the heretic. –  Ben Dunlap Aug 9 '13 at 11:18
    
(1) From 1351 to 1832 in England and the UK, counterfeiting currency was a petty treason and punishable by death. (2) Both are tied up together. Let me have a think. –  Andrew Leach Aug 9 '13 at 11:27
    
Yes, I've only recently learned that "high" treason was punished so gruesomely (disemboweling, quartering, etc.) because so many other offences were already punishable by death (albeit a much quicker and less painful death) –  Ben Dunlap Aug 9 '13 at 15:01
    
In England the Church was the State and had power to hand out the death penalty. –  Waeshael Aug 9 '13 at 15:22
show 5 more comments

Just some thoughts, many of the priests, teachers of theology and the high priest during Jesus' time thought Jesus was a heretic. It was the established church that put Jesus to death, even the pagan Pilate said "I find no fault in Him". The very individual that was sent to save them, they crucified and closed the door of their own salvation.

If there was ever anyone who qualified as being heretics, it was those who were determined to put Jesus to death. But what was Jesus response? Stone them? Burn them at the stake? No, instead He prays on the cross "Father forgive them".

In the book of Acts it is again those who claim to be following God who are trying to put Paul and the other apostles to death. They thought they were following God and would receive rewards for their zeal, but in the end they will be greatly disappointed.

During the dark ages the Bible was chained to pulpits and limited access was granted only to priests and theological leaders/scholars. This suppress of the scriptures resulted in theological and spiritual straying away from the teachings of Christ for we have this divine promise,

"Cease listening to instruction, my son, And you will stray from the words of knowledge." (Proverbs 19:27)

The Lord raised up a handful of faithful men who began to translate the Scriptures into the common languages and distribute them to the masses. This would result in a fantastic revival for the word of God has power to revive the soul for it is written

"It is the spirit who gives life, the flesh profitteth nothing, these words that I speak to you, they are spirit and they are life". (John 6:63)

When man began to regain knowledge of the word of God, they learned that just like in Jesus' time, men had made merchandise of the grace of God. Like those selling in the temple courts whom Jesus declared "Take these things hence; make not my Father's house an house of merchandise." (John 2:16) now men were claiming the forgiveness of sins by simply paying money to the church. The infinite sacrifice of Christ was lost sight of. When Simon the sorcerer tried to purchase the gift of God with money, the apostle Peter declared

“Your money perish with you, because you thought that the gift of God could be purchased with money! You have neither part nor portion in this matter, for your heart is not right in the sight of God. Repent therefore of this your wickedness, and pray God if perhaps the thought of your heart may be forgiven you. For I see that you are poisoned by bitterness and bound by iniquity." (Acts 8:20-23)

Men began to protest against the abuses of the Church and a reformation began. Those who rejected the light of God's word followed the same path as the scribes and Pharisees of Jesus' time. They began to persecute unto death. This was no surprise for it is written

That which has been is what will be, That which is done is what will be done, And there is nothing new under the sun. (Ecclesiastes 1:9)

A good history of the inquisition can be found here - http://www.whiteestate.org/books/gc/gc.asp

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.