Sign up ×
Christianity Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for committed Christians, experts in Christianity and those interested in learning more. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Do animals have free will or are they already pre-defined in what they do? Also, how does the answer to this question affect humans when we use our free will to interact with animals? I'm looking for the Catholic view point.

share|improve this question
I don't know what the Catholic POV regarding animals and free will might be. But, my cats are a constant reminder to me of the power of animals to "make free choices unconstrained by external agencies" (the WordWeb Dictionary definition of "free will"). – Pat Ferguson Aug 7 '13 at 20:23
Can you define what you mean by a "free will"? – curiousdannii Jun 3 '14 at 14:41
I'd say free will means that you do things intentionally, for specific reason(s). One could say it's exactly what an instinct is, but that's not true. The specific word is important. When you eat, it's usually not because you need energy to do something, but rather because you're hungry. That's not specific reason. – user3499 Jun 3 '14 at 14:58

1 Answer 1

I'm not sure if the Church has an explicit doctrinal position on this question, but I can give you the view of classical philosophy, as originally expounded by Aristotle and then developed chiefly by St. Thomas Aquinas. This view undergirds the thinking of most orthodox Catholic theologians, historically speaking.

In this way of thinking -- assuming you mean non-human animals, the short answer is 'no'.

Classical philosophy identifies three kinds of soul, each with its own distinctive powers:

  1. The vegetative soul has the powers of nutrition, growth, and reproduction
  2. The sensitive soul has the powers of the vegetative soul but also the powers of sense, imagination, and memory.
  3. The rational soul has the powers of the sensitive and vegetative souls, but also the powers of reason and will.

Plants have vegetative souls1. Most animals have sensitive souls, but human animals have rational souls.

The implication of saying that men have wills and animals don't is that men can, at least in principle, choose what they understand to be good even when it's not what their senses immediately perceive as good. E.g. I can choose to eat my supper before my dessert even when both are sitting in front of me.

Whereas non-human animals are pretty much compelled to pursue the goods that their senses perceive, unless they are directed otherwise by a rational will (e.g.,. a well-trained work animal is largely subject to the will of its owner).

1 Yep, I did indeed say plants have souls. In classical philosophy the "soul" is in general just that which living things have, but non-living things don't have (that's a very informal account).

share|improve this answer
I feel like the answer could be yes and no. I had an adult cat for a long time and one day, I brought a new kitten home. Sometimes, the adult cat would topple the kitten's waterbowl. And I also heard stories of where predators save and nurse a stray young of a prey. Are those known as freewill or is there another word for it? – Zoe Jun 5 '14 at 5:26
What about women? Update where you say "men" to say "human" – zipquincy Apr 17 at 19:27

protected by Community Sep 19 at 21:54

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality answers, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site.

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.