Sign up ×
Christianity Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for committed Christians, experts in Christianity and those interested in learning more. It's 100% free, no registration required.

What are the dogmatic differences between Jehovah's Witness Churches and Pentecostal Churches? Until recently I thought both churches were one and the same in beliefs.

share|improve this question

3 Answers 3

up vote 8 down vote accepted

The short version is that they are not related at all. In fact, in many major ways they are quite opposite to each other.

  • The Jehovah Witnesses are a "reconstructionist" sect that began in the late 1800's. They do claim to be Christian, but the reason I use the label reconstructionist sect is that they believe they are the only true Christian church, and that the rest of Christianity has become corrupt. Their organization is not based on historical Christianity but on new revelation through their prophetic publications, which have in turn guided them in the creation of a special translation of Scripture fixing what they claim to be the issues with other translations.

  • Pentecostalism, on the other hand, is known as a "renewal" movement. Although they have many doctrines that are distinct from the rest of Christianity, they don't claim that the rest of Christianity is totally devoid of truth. Rather than starting from scratch, they only seek to revise things a bit. Although it is a fairly new movement, dating from just the early 1900's, it has grown and taken many different shapes. Not being centrally organized, it's harder to pin any specific doctrines to Pentecostalism (as it is easy to do with the JWs because their beliefs are so precise and centrally dictated). They use the same Bible translations as other Protestants but certainly have a unique spin on some aspects of it.

There are some similarities in the early roots of Pentecostalism. One of several main roots of the movement can be traced through the Foursquare Church. Although that particular church has since taken a bit more moderate approach, its beginnings are tied up in the affairs of one Aimee Semple McPherson and her teachings, "healing ministry," and other extensive influence. Because it has many roots, and later many branches, the Pentecostal movement is not as organized or definable as a sect, but it does have some characteristic teachings such as an emphasis on continued revelation, spiritual gifts, miraculous healings, and so on.

On the other hand, the JW doctrine tends to be much more concrete. They believe in various specific end times predictions (some of which have morphed as dates come and go), and are very precise about things like terms of service to the church, doing good deeds, and so on.

In summary, while they both began at roughly the same time and some parallels could be drawn in the way they first started, they are completely different entities. Early on they were driven by very different influences, and they have become very different beasts. Their teachings bear little resemblance to each other, and many of their teachings are mutually exclusive.

share|improve this answer

Basically, a lot.

Jehovah's Witnesses are not really related to Pentecostalism

For one thing, Jehovah's Witnesses teach that the Watchtower literature is the most accurate interpretation of scripture, while Pentecostals believe in scripture being relevant to modern life without having to rely on the leadership of a church to lead them; the Jehovah's Witnesses believe in "divine guidance" that allows them to claim that certain parts of scripture are poorly translated or inaccurate.

There are major soteriological differences: Pentecostals basically believe that faith alone is sufficient for salvation, often but not always including baptism in the Holy Spirit, while Jehovah's Witnesses have a doctrine that requires works for salvation (to prove that their faith is genuine).

In addition, Jehovah's Witnesses believe that we are in the end times (making various apocalyptic predictions that haven't seemed to come true), while Pentecostals don't really have a defined statement on that as a larger movement.

The two groups are, to a certain degree, apples and oranges.

Jehovah's Witnesses are a sect, and Pentecostalism is a movement. I attended a Pentecostal church, and they were relatively midline for Pentecostals, but there was no real organization that they were a part of; meanwhile, the Jehovah's Witnesses have a hierarchy and direct leadership. You may find individual Pentecostal movements that have different beliefs, or incorporated beliefs of other sects, but as a general rule they are not related to the Jehovah's Witnesses, who predate them.

share|improve this answer

Massive differences. On the outside, the Jehovah's Witness organization appears to be a regular Christian church. But JWs hold to a very different set of beliefs. Dig deeper and you'll find that:

Jehovah's Witnesses

  • deny that Jesus is God
  • don't believe in a literal hell
  • believe that Jesus makes up for your lack, i.e., you do your best and Jesus makes up the difference
  • believe that a limited number of special people go to heaven (144,000 only)


  • believe that Jesus is God
  • believe that hell is a very real place
  • believe that all those that believe will be saved and will go to heaven
  • believe in baptism of the Holy Spirit
  • believe that the gifts of the Holy Spirit such as healing, speaking in tongues, and prophecy are for today, and did not pass away with the original church
share|improve this answer
Welcome to the site! This was a very good first answer. I look forward to seeing more posts from you. –  David Jun 11 '13 at 1:31
This is mostly really good—right until near the end. Both the general statement that Petacostals believe "everything most other churches believe" and the labeling of a church as "Pentecostal Presbyterian" can only make sense if words are stripped of their normal meanings and rendered useless for the purpose of discussion. It's simply not true that they believe "all" the same things as there is a consistent pattern of differences between Pentacolstalism and other branches of Christianity, and the classical meaning of terms logically excludes both from being properly applied to the same group. –  Caleb Sep 5 at 7:11
In line with the comment by @Caleb, I've deleted the last two paragraphs as questionable and tangential, and removed the final bullet point under "Pentecostals." Also did general editing on the answer. –  Lee Woofenden Oct 2 at 23:32
In your opinion Caleb. But that's fine. Lee please don't change peoples answers so much. It' my answer not yours. –  Matt Oct 2 at 23:58

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.