Christianity Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for committed Christians, experts in Christianity and those interested in learning more. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

This question already has an answer here:

In the Old Testament there is a scripture about an eye for an eye law:

[Exodus 21:23~25] And if [any] mischief follow, then thou shalt give life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, burning for burning, wound for wound, stripe for stripe.

However, things changed in the New Testament:

[Mat 5:38~42]Ye have heard that it hath been said, An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth: But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.And if any man will sue thee at the law, and take away thy coat, let him have [thy] cloke also.And whosoever shall compel thee to go a mile, go with him twain.Give to him that asketh thee, and from him that would borrow of thee turn not thou away.

So it seems the 'an eye for an eye' law was agreed in the Old Testament, but disagreed in the New Testament, a contradiction!

It confused me. What was the genuine opinion of the Lord God in the end? Or did his mind get changed?

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by David, wax eagle May 31 '13 at 15:32

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

Nobody but God knows the genuine opinion of God. The best we can give you is what various denominations, or major Christian thinkers THINK God's opinion is. As it stands the question doesn't meet the site guidelines. It's not answerable by anyone but God Himself. If you're willing to settle for what some denomination, or major group/famous Christian says on the subject, please edit the question to make it fit within site guidelines. See this meta post for assistance:… – David May 31 '13 at 15:29
@waxeagle I dont see how this is a duplicate. I also think this is not a Truth question as David hinted. – fredsbend May 31 '13 at 18:10
@davidstratton There is an obvious question: why did Christ say this which seems against the Law? There is a clear objective answer. – fredsbend May 31 '13 at 18:11
@fredsbend Agree. This is what confused me. – Popopo Jun 1 '13 at 4:19
up vote 4 down vote accepted

The distinction between the Old Testament and New is that the Old Testament laws were given to the nation of Israel as part of the covenant between God and the people of Israel. The "eye for an eye" seems harsh to many people, but it was actually a law of restraint. One eye for one eye--NOT two eyes, one arm and a foot for one eye. "Burn for burn"--not "whole villages aflame". The idea was to put the punishment into congruence with the actual offense. Vengeance would most often greatly exceed this standard.

In the New Testament, Jesus is speaking not to the nation of Israel with regard to the covenant, but to individuals. He was also speaking while the entire world was on the brink of the inception of the new covenant.

So, Old Testament Covenant applies to the nation of Israel as long as that covenant is in effect. That means between God and the nation of Israel between the time of Moses and the inception of the new and better covenant--roughly 1600 B.C. to 33 A.D.

Questions like this come up fairly often on this site. People ask, "Should I sacrifice a lamb or not eat pork or not wear clothing with mixed fabrics?" The answer is, "Yes, if you are Jewish and are living between 1600 B.C. and 33 A.D." However, if you are non-Jewish or are alive today, the Old Testament Convent Laws are not binding on you.

share|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.