Sign up ×
Christianity Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for committed Christians, experts in Christianity and those interested in learning more. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sanhedrin condemned:

  1. Jesus
  2. James the Just
  3. Stephen

Well, however Jews opposed death penalty. A Sanhedrin that condemn one man to death in 75 years is bloody.

Yet they killed at least 3 and those are only the prominent ones.

So how come?

This is NOT to promote antisemitism. I simply want to know the historical nuance at that time. This is purely historical question with strong relation to Christianity.

share|improve this question
This is a good question! A good answer should acknowledge Paul's part in the killing of Christians - per Acts 7. – Affable Geek Mar 26 '13 at 1:43
The question is important for me because many doubts Jesus existence. However, if death penalty is rare and few prominent christians are killed, then the event is a historical landmark and we can expound the rest from there. – Jim Thio Mar 26 '13 at 2:09
@Jim Thio: So, you take everything in the Talmud as fact, do you? We can expound from there after you prove your premise. – H3br3wHamm3r81 Mar 26 '13 at 3:21
I do not believe the Sanhedran at the time of Christ had authority under Rome to kill anyone legally. They could pronounce guilt but the death penalty could only be declared under the authority of Rome. Israel was a vassal state without this power. The crowd could stone somone but it was illegal. – Mike Mar 26 '13 at 4:41
Jewish or Christian? Depends. Was the apostle Peter Jewish or Christian? Comments really aren't the place for those kind of question, just so you know. (See my profile) – H3br3wHamm3r81 Mar 26 '13 at 5:27

1 Answer 1

How many they killed is not easy to know in absence of any historical records. They must have killed many and they did conspire to kill these three prominent ones and few more.The Sanhedrin did not have the power under Roman authority to put someone to death (Jn 18:31). This power was supposedly revoked in 30 A.D. But that did not keep them from hatching conspiracies in these meetings to get their opponets killed and they were only short of passing a formal death sentence.

Plotted to kill Jesus through Romans:

In absence of this power, Sanhedrin plotted to have Him murdered (Jn 11:47-53), paid Judas Iscariot 30 pieces of silver to betray Jesus (Mt 26:14-16)(Mk 14:10-11)(Lk 22:1-6), had Him arrested and tried Him using false witnesses to accuse Him (Mt 26:47-66)(Mk 14:43-65)(Lk 22:47-53)(Jn 18:1-27), then pressured Pontus Pilate into having Him crucified (Mt 27:1-26)(Mk 15:1-15)(Lk 23:1-25)(Jn 18:28-19:16).

Also this court was to meet every day during daytime hours and was not to meet on the Sabbath or holy days,but broke this rule to condemn Jesus.

They plotted to kill James the just and Stephan:

According to the Jewish historian Josephus, in 62 A.D. the High Priest named Ananus assembled a Sanhedrin who condemned James, the Lord's brother, "on the charge of breaking the law" and had him stoned to death.

They also got Stephan killed by infuriating a mob:The Sanhedrin listened to the charges brought against Stephen (Acts 6:8-7:1) and then allowed the murder of Stephen by stoning (Acts 7:54-60).

Also in addition to these three:

The Sanhedrin also ordered Peter and John not to proclaim the name of Jesus (Acts 4:1-22), and when they would not stop, they had them beaten (Acts 5:17-42).

Paul was brought before the Sanhedrin and spoke to them (Acts 22:30-23:6), and afterwards they conspired to murder him (Acts 23:12-22).

Why this historical nuance?

Truly the Stakes were very high and if we agree with your view that "Sanhedrin that condemn one man to death in 75 years is bloody" then killing of these prominent three, can be only described as a knee jerk action in a do or die situation to arrest a budding movement that was to change the face of this world. Jewish authorities had rightly judged this movement as not any ordinary one. Jews had already lost their political clout and now they were in the process of losing their religious hold on general Jewish public. This echoed in Bible:

John 11:47–48

Then gathered the chief priests and the Pharisees a council, and said, What do we? for this man doeth many miracles. If we let him thus alone, all men will believe on him: and the Romans shall come and take away both our place and nation.

share|improve this answer
Interesting. So they killed 3. That's the famous case. Know how many they killed? – Jim Thio Mar 28 '13 at 2:18
The fact that, when they could get these subjects killed, even when they did not have the power to do so, a Jewish record of statistics, if any, would not be an authentic, for reasons that (i) the head of Sanhedrin get fired from his position for doing so (ii) society tags that Sanhedrin as bloody if they condemn one man to death even in 75 years and (iii) considering that Romans crucified/killed thousands during their rule. It is a search in vain I presume. – Seek forgiveness Mar 28 '13 at 6:18
Yes I am aware that the head of sandhedrin got fired because of james. The sanhedrin are not as blood thirsty as what most christians think. – Jim Thio Mar 28 '13 at 8:55

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.