Take the 2-minute tour ×
Christianity Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for committed Christians, experts in Christianity and those interested in learning more. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Some sects including Jehovah's Witnesses believe the archangel Michael to be one in the same with Christ. The basic premise of this claim seems to stem from the unique usage of the role archangel rather than just any-ol-angel.

Michael is the only one said to be the 'archangel', meaning 'chief angel' or 'principal angel'.

I would like to know what a mainline Protestant understanding about the role of "archangel" is. What makes them different from a mainline* angel? Do they bear any special relation to Christ? How many might there be?

Also, are there any ways in which Protestants view the type "archangel" differently than other major traditions?

* Sorry, couldn't resist.

share|improve this question
    
This question is similar and the answer is awesome. –  fredsbend the Grinch Mar 3 '13 at 5:04

3 Answers 3

An archangel, in the Protestant definition, is simply an angel with a high rank, often referred to as a "chief" angel. It is believed that they have a higher rank, and power.

Not much else is known for sure, as precious little is found about them in the Bible

As was stated previously, the Bible gives us precious little information about angelic beings - especially the Archangels. We would all like to know more about these extraordinary creatures, yet God has chosen in this present age to disclose very limited knowledge about them. In the kingdom of God, however, all will be made clear to us, including the mystery of the angels:

The understanding isn't significantly different than the Catholic or Eastern Orthodox understanding. The Catholic Encyclopedia article on angels does give a bit more information on what "higher rank" might mean by showing their understanding of the hierarchy:

St. Thomas (Summa Theologica I:108), following St. Denis (De Coelesti Hierarchia, vi, vii), divides the angels into three hierarchies each of which contains three orders. Their proximity to the Supreme Being serves as the basis of this division. In the first hierarchy he places the Seraphim, Cherubim, and Thrones; in the second, the Dominations, Virtues, and Powers; in the third, the Principalities, Archangels, and Angels. The only Scriptural names furnished of individual angels are Raphael, Michael, and Gabriel, names which signify their respective attributes. Apocryphal Jewish books, such as the Book of Enoch, supply those of Uriel and Jeremiel, while many are found in other apocryphal sources, like those Milton names in "Paradise Lost". (On superstitious use of such names, see above).

Archangels, like all angels are created beings. Certain denominations claim that Jesus was an angel, but this is considered a heresy by most Christian denominations, as it denies the divinity of Christ.

share|improve this answer

There is some debate over how many archangels there are. Gabriel is referred to as an archangel by Catholic tradition, but there is no scripture supporting that. The apocryphal 'Book of Enoch' as well as Ephesians 1:21 and Colossians 1:16 was used by Tomas Aquinas and others preceding him, to develop the 'Angelic Hierarchy', but scripture is very vague when it comes to this.

The word "archangel" comes from the Greek αρχάγγελος (archaggělǒs), meaning chief angel, a translation of the Hebrew רב־מלאך (rav-mal'ákh). There are only 2 verses in the NT that say "Archangel", 1 Thessalonians 4:16 and Jude 1:9. They both refer to Michael as the archangel (singular), though Michael is also referred to in the OT, Daniel 10:13-21, as "one of the chief princes" (vs 13) (also translated as chief angels in some translations). So scripture isn't clear as to whether he is one of several/many archangels, or the only one.

It is important to note that Michael is AN angel, and therefore not accorded the same favors that are afforded to Christ (Hebrews 1:5, 2:5), as the author of Hebrews shows how unique the Son of God is, even above the angels, nor will the world be subject to them, unlike Christ, who will reign (Revelation 19:16; Matthew 2:1, 2; 9:35). Also, Jude 1:9 presents Michael as not even have the power to rebuke Satan alone, as he stated "the Lord rebuke you", whereas Christ had the power to rebuke Satan and demons on his own authority (Matthew 4:10, 16:23, 17:18; Mark 8:33; Luke 4:35).

share|improve this answer

While Mikha'el ("Michael") is referred to as an ἀρχάγγελος ("archangel") in the Greek New Testament (Jude 1:9), some assume that he is the only archangel in existence.

However, Dan. 10:13 states that Mikh'ael is אחד השרים הראשנים, that is, "one of the chief princes," not the chief prince. If Mikh'ael is an "archangel," and also "one of the chief princes," then this equates "archangel" with "chief prince" and implies that there are other archangels. Scripture does not mention them because they're not relevant.

share|improve this answer
1  
Can you explain the logic in the second paragraph better? I do not see how Michael holding those two titles proves or even implies that there are other archangels by way of saying that they are the same title. Can he not hold two titles at the same time? You also seem quite knowledgeable in Greek. Does the prefix 'arch' in 'archangel' have any inherent implications that support or reject your answer? –  fredsbend the Grinch Feb 27 '13 at 7:09

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.