Christianity Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for committed Christians, experts in Christianity and those interested in learning more. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I just asked this question looking for where this view point came from and when it was made popular.

Ceremonial Law: This type of law relates to Israel's worship. (Lev 1:1-13) The laws pointed forward to Jesus Christ and were no longer necessary after Jesus' death and resurrection. Though we are no longer bound to them, the principles behind the ceremonial laws, that is to worship and love God, still apply.
Civil Law: This law dictated Israel's daily living (Deut 24:10-11); but modern society and culture are so radically different that some of these guidelines cannot be followed specifically. The principles behind the commands are used to guide our conduct.
Moral Law: The moral laws are direct commands of God. A good example are the Ten Commandments (Ex 20:1-17). The moral laws reveal the nature and will of God, and still apply to us today. We do not obey this moral law as a way to obtain salvation, but to live in ways pleasing to God.

Here I would like to get answers on the Biblical support for this viewpoint.

share|improve this question
related:… – Mike Feb 26 '13 at 0:59
similar, but slightly different… – wax eagle Feb 26 '13 at 1:02

Because this idea is a "Christian-ese" concept that has traditionally been used to explain the heart of the Gospel with respect to the law, any answer here that Biblically explain this view will not necessarily "support this viewpoint." Much like T.U.L.I.P and the seven dispensational epochs, concepts like this tend to oversimplify Biblical truths. This doesn't mean it is unbiblical, but that it should never replace the Biblical foundation it stands on.

Moral Law: Jesus gave his own interpretation of the law in His Sermon on the Mount, but without the epistles, early Christians only had the Old Testament to deduce what part of God's commands were part of our training toward maturity (our tutor in Gal. 3:24), and what parts reflect the Law of Liberty in Christ (Rom 8:2). Jesus' revelationary [sic] contribution to our understanding of Moses' law tells us that we are not to disregard it completely, but we need to discern which parts of the law were established for our "upbringing," and which they would have to preserve in their new life with Christ. When Jesus said "You know the commandments" to the rich young ruler in Mar 10:19, he was likely talking about the Ten commandments, or more broadly, the "Moral Law" of Moses. Even with our death to the law (see Rom. 7:4), our obligation to be like Christ does not change. The Prophet David says in Psa 40:6 "Burnt offering and sin offering You did not require," but this sounds contradictory since God literally did require it in Moses' law. But not forever. This example is a good distinction between where Moses' law and the Law of Liberty separate. God calls David a man after His own heart probably in part because he saw the difference. Other verses like this exist. See Micah 6:8:

He has shown you, O man, what is good; And what does the LORD require of you But to do justly, To love mercy, And to walk humbly with your God?

So, the "Moral Law" in our simplified tri-part system we're examining here are any of those commands about which David could not have said "you did not require." Most of these "required" laws, based on our David definition have a broader "Law-of-Liberty" version: Hate is murder (Matt. 5:22), idolatry is covetousness (Col. 3:5), but, as always, God's heart doesn't change.

Ceremonial Law The letter to the Hebrews (especially chapter nine) reveals that much of Moses' law contained copies or patterns of heavenly truths. Just as there is an altar in Moses' law, there is a version of that in heaven, from the Priesthood, down to the altar and candles. These patterns given to us in Moses are "Shadows of the good things to come" (Heb 10:1), so they are similar to the Moral Laws in that they reveal a bigger truth. In this case however, the truths they reveal are not mandates of holiness. They are symbols of heavenly places. So the "Ceremonial Law" in our simplified tri-part system, are any commands about which David could have said "you did not require," and were shadows of things to come, and were not primarily commands for civic functions. Not all these are in Hebrews, but it gives us a good starting point.

Civil Law By process of elimination, I would say that these commands are those which do not adequately fit in the categories above, but, like your question states, called the Hebrew people to form a working society. In my opinion, it's really hard to separate this category from the Ceremonial Law without adequately defining "Civil" and "Ceremonial." Especially in a society where law and faith are never separated. Laws that talk about inheritance, land boundaries, and punishment for crime, might nicely fit here, but couldn't someone also say they point to shadows of things to come, i.e., the judgement and reward of God's people and enemies? Maybe, but again, this three-fold division is never explicitly made in the scriptures.

share|improve this answer
Does your argument hinge on Ps 40:6, "you did not require"? It seems like poetry is not the best place for making much of a few words. I read to sound more like 1 Sam 15:22-23 and Micah 6:6-8, as opposed to a statement of a differing kind suggesting that some laws are required and some are not. – mojo Dec 17 '13 at 4:47
"Our obligation to be like Christ" has reasonable limits, doesn't it? Jesus lived and died as a Jew, presumably including all the rituals, observances, and sacrifices of Judaism. Do we mimic (or aspire to do so) him in all those? – mojo Dec 17 '13 at 4:51
Your mention of what early Christians had is interesting (since I don't know precisely what they had). I would presume that in addition to the OT, they had an oral tradition of Jesus' teachings. When he taught, Paul started with the OT, but didn't end there. Do you have a source for the assertion that early Christians had to deduce which mandates were eternal and which applied only to Jews? – mojo Dec 17 '13 at 4:54


It explains the history of the divisions.

The following exhibit the oneness of the law biblically: For whoever keeps the whole law and yet stumbles in one point, he has become guilty of all. James 2:10 - Christ fulfilled the law. Mat 5:7 - The law is fulfilled in those that walk by the Spirit, Romans 8:4 - The law is fulfilled by loving each other, Gal 5:14

share|improve this answer
Welcome to the site! This doesn't really have much to do with your answer, but I find that sharing the following tends to help new visitors avoid mistaking the purpose of this site. I do hope to see more from you! When you get a chance, please see How we are different than other sites? and What makes a good supported answer? – David Feb 4 '14 at 3:34
Also... While this link may answer the question, it is better to include the essential parts of the answer here and provide the link for reference. Link-only answers can become invalid if the linked page changes. See the help topic on why some answers are deleted for more. – David Feb 4 '14 at 3:35

There is none. The distinction between moral, civil, and ceremonial has been made by men's traditions over a lengthy period of time. It is clear that the New Covenant frees us from some specific portions of the law (dietary restrictions, temple worship, priesthood, holidays), not by simply getting rid of them, but by advancing them from their shadowy prefiguring and into something better (Christ is the new priest and sacrifice, the believer is the new temple, eternal life our ultimate Sabbath etc.) Jesus said that anyone who taught against even the smallest command is the least in his kingdom (Matthew 5). Anyone who tries to overthrow God's laws by callling them "civil" and saying they are only for Jews is deceived and is a deceiver.

Most interesting is the fact that what Christians call "civil law" is very unclearly defined because there is no scriptural definition. It seems that every time there is a new supreme court decision the list of laws we don't have to follow anymore gets a little longer...

share|improve this answer
Welcome to Christianity.SE! I hope you'll spend some time browsing the questions and answers here. Please understand that this site is not about what's true or false, but about what different denominations and groups of Christians believe. Please see How we are different than other sites. And for a quick introduction to this site, please take the Site Tour. – Lee Woofenden Jun 1 '15 at 14:13

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.