Sign up ×
Christianity Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for committed Christians, experts in Christianity and those interested in learning more. It's 100% free, no registration required.

If animals don't have eternal souls, then it seems they would not be present in heaven or hell. Is heaven devoid of animals?

Growing up I frequently saw art depicting the lion and the lamb together in a friendly manner rather than as predator and prey.

In what context are we to witness this? And what purpose do the lion's teeth and claws serve once it becomes a straw connoisseur?

The wolf and the lamb shall feed together, and the lion shall eat straw like the bullock: and dust shall be the serpent's meat. They shall not hurt nor destroy in all my holy mountain, saith the LORD. (Isaiah 65:25)

share|improve this question

closed as off-topic by bruised reed, Nathaniel, Mr. Bultitude, El'endia Starman Aug 29 at 2:41

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "Questions asking for the truth or validity of a particular doctrine or belief (aka Truth Questions), and questions asking Is X a Sin? are not a good fit for our site, due to their subjective nature, and the vast number of possible Christian opinions on such topics. See: We can't handle the truth" – bruised reed, Nathaniel, Mr. Bultitude, El'endia Starman
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

Lion and the lamb are a methaphors, for enemies being friends. It doesn't mean that lamb and lion will literally enter heaven. – user unknown Aug 31 '11 at 16:27
The wolf and lamb together are not in heaven, but on the new earth, after Christ comes again. – Steve Jun 16 '13 at 18:46
This question asks about two distinct issues which makes it too broad: the Truth question of whether animals go to heaven, and how to understand Isaiah 65:25. – curiousdannii Aug 23 at 12:23

3 Answers 3

In the Bible God prohibited the killing of man ("You shall not murder," Exodus 20:13) but he placed no such restriction on the killing of animals. Man is made in God’s image, so man must not kill one of his own kind. Animals, it would seem, are different from man. If they do have a "soul" that survives death, it is different from man’s. It does not need redemption.

Christ died to save the souls of human beings, not animals.

share|improve this answer

Some of the information contained in this post requires additional references. Please edit to add citations to reliable sources that support the assertions made here. Unsourced material may be disputed or deleted.

Does this mean that Fido won't be around with us in the afterlife? – Cavere Mendacia Aug 31 '11 at 16:38
You could of course believe in Fido being around in your afterlive and ignore the scripture.. – Sven Aug 31 '11 at 16:41
This says nothing about the recreation of all things, which if there is a 'new heaven and new earth' there would certainly be. If the original creation contained animals, it is not unreasonable to assume the new would as well. – user304 Aug 31 '11 at 16:49
Fido could belong to someone else in the afterlife :) – tunmise fashipe May 19 '13 at 12:59
This doesn't answer the question of whether animals go to heaven/hell. – Lee Woofenden Aug 23 at 5:06

There are a few theories about this, and I will try to explain the general categories.

  1. Animals do not have immortal souls (they do not have the image of God given to man when he was first created) and thus cease to exist when they die. There is nothing that can befall them after death such as condemnation or eternal salvation.
  2. Animals are not immortal, but are saved or preserved through the actions and memories of human beings, as some hold the rest of creation will be. In this view it is possible that 'nothing will be forgotten' and in the next life these most-loved creatures may be re-created with the 'new heavens and new earth'.
  3. Animals do have immortal souls, although this view seems to be unclear and is perhaps a confusion that arises from anthropomorphization of animals in fiction to serve as metaphors for humans ('All Dogs go to Heaven'.) This view essentially humanizes animals, and treats all killing as murder, even of animals. Whether this extends to creatures that do not possess possibly humanizable characteristics such as faces, arms, etc, is also unclear.

As for the second part, I have heard a few theories:

  1. Lion and lamb are metaphors for something, examples could be 'courage' and 'meekness' as qualities, or fierce warriors and gentle pacifists.
  2. As in the original creation, the fangs and strength of the lion existed for some other purpose than to kill lambs or other creatures. In the new creation the lion would have no need to use his strength or armaments to hunt for food or violently defend his territory.
  3. The 'lion' laying down with the 'lamb' is a symbol for Christ ('the Lamb of God' and 'the Lion of Judah').
share|improve this answer

This answer is based on the Christian theology of Emanuel Swedenborg (1688-1772), and reflects the views of the "Swedenborgian" or "New Church" denominations that accept his theology. Except for the last part, about the "Peaceable Kingdom" passages in Isaiah, this answer is extracted and edited from my article, "Will We See our Pets Again in Heaven?"

Animals do not have eternal souls

It would certainly be more popular among animal-lovers to say that animals have eternal souls. However, from a Christian perspective, while animals do have souls, their souls are not eternal, as human souls are.

Animals do have souls. Without souls they could not be alive. Our body is not alive by itself. Rather, it is our soul that lives within our body, and gives life to our body. When we die, what actually happens is that our soul leaves our body. Without the soul to give it life, our body is as dead as a doornail. It's just a very complex piece of organic matter that soon decomposes and is reabsorbed into the earth.

Animals, too, must have souls in order to be alive. When they die, their souls, too, leave their bodies. However, unlike human souls, they do not go on to a conscious existence in the spiritual world. Instead, they are reabsorbed into the spiritual ecosystem just as their bodies are reabsorbed into the material ecosystem.

Animal souls vs. human souls

Why the difference between animal souls and human souls?

Animal souls consist only of the lowest level of spiritual reality. This level has to do with taking care of basic physical and psychological needs such as food, water, shelter, reproduction, and the companionship and protection of the group in social animals. Animals need these external, earth-oriented spiritual levels so that they can go about their daily lives seeking and obtaining what they need to continue living and perpetuate their species.

Human souls add the higher, more spiritual and heavenly levels of spiritual reality. These levels give us:

  • The ability to think rationally and consider not only different possible courses of action, but their various moral, ethical, and spiritual implications.
  • The spiritual freedom to make moral, ethical, and spiritual choices, such as whether we will act from love and concern for our fellow human beings or act only for our own advancement and pleasure.
  • The ability to think about God and the spiritual world, and make goals that involve more than satisfying material and social needs. We humans are able to direct our life according to the will of God as we understand it, and to act for the eternal wellbeing of ourselves and our fellow human beings.

These are all things that lower animals simply can't do.

And these are precisely the things that make human souls eternal. In particular, our ability to form a conscious relationship with God is what makes our soul eternal. Even if we choose to reject our relationship with God, the fact that we have the ability to do so means that a human being's soul will never cease to exist as a conscious, self-aware being.

Animals do not have spiritual freedom or rationality, and cannot even think about God, let alone form a relationship with God. Their souls are focused on the things of this earth, not on the things of heaven. That's why their conscious existence is limited to this earth. In a sense, this earth is their heaven.

There are animals in heaven

Just because animals don't have eternal souls, that doesn't mean there are no animals in heaven.

All of the animals we see here on earth also exist in the spiritual world—and many more that don't even exist here!

However, the animals in the spiritual world are not the souls of animals who have died on earth. Instead, they are reflections and expressions of the thoughts and feelings of the (human) spirits and angels who live in the various areas of the spiritual world.

Heaven contains beautiful and gentle animals because they reflect and express the state of mind of the people there. Different angels and communities of angels will have different animals because angels, like people on earth, are different from one another.

For the same reason, hell contains frightful and vicious animals because they reflect the state of mind of the evil spirits there. In fact, from a distance, evil spirits themselves often look like fierce, predatory animals—because that's exactly what they are like in character and personality.

In short, the animals in the spiritual world do not come from the material world. Instead, they come into being in the spiritual world based on the thoughts and feelings of the people there.

"The wolf and the lamb shall feed together"

Swedenborg interpreted Isaiah 65:25 metaphorically, as referring to the peace and protection from evil that will be enjoyed by those who are a part of the Lord's kingdom in heaven.

Here is what he says about a similar passage from Isaiah in Apocalypse Explained #314:3, in a fairly old-fashioned translation—which is all that's in print for this work. I have edited to make it a little more understandable for today's readers:

The wolf shall dwell with the lamb, and the leopard shall lie down with the kid; the calf and the young lion and the fatling together; and a little boy shall lead them. And the she-calf and the bear shall feed; their young ones shall lie down together; the suckling shall play on the hole of the adder, and the weaned child shall put his hand on the cockatrice's den. (Isaiah 11:6-8).
These things are said about the Lord's advent, about His kingdom, and about those in it who are engaged in the good of innocence: that they will have nothing to fear from hell and the evils that come from hell because they are protected by the Lord. The Lord's kingdom is here described by innocence of various kinds, and by their opposites, from which they will be defended. The lamb means innocence of the inmost level; its opposite is the wolf. The kid means innocence of the second level, of which the opposite is the leopard. The calf means innocence of the lowest level, of which the opposite is the young lion. Innocence of the inmost level is the kind that belongs to those who are in the third or inmost heaven, and its good is called heavenly good. Innocence of the second level is the kind that belongs to those who are in the second or middle heaven, and its good is called spiritual good. And innocence of the lowest level is the kind that belongs to those who are in the first or lowest heaven, and its good is called natural-spiritual good. Because the goods of innocence are described by these, it is therefore also said, "And a little boy shall lead them," and also, "The suckling shall play on the hole of the adder, and the weaned child shall put his hand upon the cockatrice's den." A boy, a suckling, and a weaned child also symbolize those levels of innocence.

You can see the original translation from which I edited this here. Scroll down to the paragraph that starts with a 3 in brackets.

share|improve this answer

protected by Caleb Mar 12 '13 at 6:45

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality answers, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site.

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.