Take the 2-minute tour ×
Christianity Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for committed Christians, experts in Christianity and those interested in learning more. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Accident being defined as an attribute or property contingent upon the existence of something else, from the Latin word accidēns, or the Greek word συμβεβηκός (symbebēkos). Do accidents exist in God?

share|improve this question
add comment

3 Answers

up vote 3 down vote accepted

St. Thomas Aquinas addresses this directly in the Summa.

Article 6. Whether in God there are any accidents?

I answer that, From all we have said, it is clear there can be no accident in God.

First, because a subject is compared to its accidents as potentiality to actuality; for a subject is in some sense made actual by its accidents. But there can be no potentiality in God, as was shown (2, 3).

Secondly, because God is His own existence; and as Boethius says (Hebdom.), although every essence may have something superadded to it, this cannot apply to absolute being: thus a heated substance can have something extraneous to heat added to it, as whiteness, nevertheless absolute heat can have nothing else than heat.

Thirdly, because what is essential is prior to what is accidental. Whence as God is absolute primal being, there can be in Him nothing accidental. Neither can He have any essential accidents (as the capability of laughing is an essential accident of man), because such accidents are caused by the constituent principles of the subject. Now there can be nothing caused in God, since He is the first cause. Hence it follows that there is no accident in God.

Briefly, there are no accidents in God.

The entire section on The Simplicity of God may help to clarify this, if there's any confusion. The main contributing points, I think, are that God's essence and existence are one in the same, that God is His own essence and existence, and that God is absolutely simple.

share|improve this answer
    
And you agree with Thomas, svidgen? –  H3br3wHamm3r81 Feb 4 '13 at 4:21
    
Yes. And if I'm not mistaken, the Catholic Church also generally agrees. God is the simple act of being itself. I think the fuller context of Article 6 helps "prove" the point. But, if you're looking for Biblical references, I'd note the significance given to God's name in the OT, and the fact that Jesus' name is in itself an honoring of God's name. –  svidgen Feb 4 '13 at 4:45
add comment

Perhaps being forgiving and compassionate might be attributes contingent upon something else, namely the existence of an entity requiring compassion and forgiveness. God, in and of himself, requires no forgiveness or compassion for weaknesses, as he has no weakness or sin.

Of course, the argument that being compassionate and forgiving might be an accident could easily be offset by saying that those attributes are really only extensions of love, which would be something that would already exist in God on account of the fact that the trinity already expresses perfect love among it's members.

I would probably have to vote no on this one. It is we who change, not God.

share|improve this answer
    
Accidents can be predicated of something else. Therefore, accidents are usually categorized as adjectives. Forgiveness and compassion are nouns. It is true that we say "God is love," but again, accidents themselves are adjectives. For example, Mike is tall. Tall would be an accident. Now, compassionate and forgiving are accidents, but not compassion and forgiveness. –  H3br3wHamm3r81 Feb 3 '13 at 19:43
    
Okay, I've changed the words to reflect the adjective form. The overall answer has not changed. –  David Morton Feb 3 '13 at 19:47
    
What do you mean by "requiring compassion and forgiveness"? Do you mean the entity requires compassion and forgiveness for himself, or do you mean the entity has the potential to have compassion and forgiveness towards others? –  H3br3wHamm3r81 Feb 3 '13 at 19:51
add comment

There can be no accidents in God but God has created life so that accidents exist for every member of creation. The reason why no accidents can occur in God is already couched in your question, I presume rhetorically.

Nothing in God is truly contingent upon the existence of something else. As God alone is infinite, all that he is is without boundary or parts. Being infinite in knowledge and infinitely wise to decide every best choice in time, before he created time, means for want of better words, God chose everything before anything existed to chose between. As he can not change and can't improve in that decision for want of knowledge or perfection he can't be properly influenced outside of himself.

In time, to our human understanding he appears to be influenced by many things, for example our desire for him, our prayers, etc., but there is much truth to our perception. The only correction needed is that God chose before the foundations of the world that he would be influenced by us at any given movement based on his own properties from eternity in infinite self-sufficiency.

Nature, including humans, are in the opposite position on this point. It's properties and attributes are under the influence of many things especially God. While God can't be influenced man always is.

share|improve this answer
    
I'm not so sure we're talking about the same "accident" here. I think you're referring to "accident" in the sense of something occurring by chance. –  H3br3wHamm3r81 Feb 4 '13 at 0:35
    
I stll don't know. lol. It's not about God being contingent on anything. It's about accidents being contingent on God for their existence. An accident is like a characteristic, a trait, an attribute. For example, "man is wise." "Wise" would be an accident. What if I say, "God is wise." That's the question. Goes God have accidents? Do they exist in Him? This is a difficult question because it brings up the question of immutability. When we say, "That man is wise," I think we can all agree that, sure, he is wise at that moment, but he may say something that isn't really wise. –  H3br3wHamm3r81 Feb 4 '13 at 3:11
    
Then, there's also relativity. Sure, he may be wise to you, but to someone else, who is wiser, he may not seem wise at all. "Accident" is a philosophical term, used extensively by Aristotle and then later by Thomas Aquinas (as well as other philosophers). –  H3br3wHamm3r81 Feb 4 '13 at 3:12
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.