Take the 2-minute tour ×
Christianity Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for committed Christians, experts in Christianity and those interested in learning more. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Possible Duplicate:
What is the specific meaning of “die” in Genesis 2?

In the book of Genesis, God said they would die if they eat from a certain tree

Genesis 2:17 But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.

From this verse, it seems to me that man was immortal before they ate the fruit. And after they ate the fruit, God said they should not be allowed to eat from the fruit of life

Genesis 3:22 And the Lord God said, Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil: and now, lest he put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever

  • Did it mean that man would not die or be killed (even by God) if they ate from the tree. Why was God worried they would live forever?

  • If man was immortal before the fall, the presence of the tree of life had no meaning to them?

share|improve this question
    
There are similar questions to this already raised but I do not think it is a full duplicate. I have also been looking for a place to put a reasonable answer and the way similar questions are raised the bas of the questions seems to have prevented one. –  Mike Jan 28 '13 at 10:03
1  
The first bullet point is a duplicate of christianity.stackexchange.com/questions/1589/… and the second bullet point is an exact duplicate of this: christianity.stackexchange.com/questions/1718/… –  David Stratton Jan 28 '13 at 12:36
add comment

marked as duplicate by David Stratton, warren, Affable Geek, Andrew, Narnian Jan 28 '13 at 21:36

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

1 Answer

up vote 1 down vote accepted

First, if we take the tree to symbolize a pledge to Adam the immortality and all that life required, based on continued obedience to all the commands of God, then the tree was a pledge to Adam that so long as he did not eat from the forbidden tree he would have lived forever. This is reasonable.

Second, by sinning Adam lost that immortality, therefore the pledge must necessarily be removed and access to it be forbidden.

The actual death of Adam for sinning was not due to anything inherent in the fruit of the tree physically, but in his internal disobedience. Similarly, eating from the physical tree of life could not have redeemed his soul to life, or his body, as there is no such 'magical fruit' that can forgive the consequences of sin, or kill. Rather when God says 'they must not eat of it', he is referring to the eternal life as a reward which presumes full obedience to all his laws. This Adam must no longer physically do, for the act would betray its symbolic meaning. God physically made it impossible to eat from the tree with flaming swords reminding him of his cursed state, in order to maintain the symbolic messages both trees conveyed. In other words, Adam could not physically eat from the physical tree because he could not internally obey all God's commands in his depraved sinful state and ...live forever in so doing. The tree needed to be replaced by a new tree of life, i.e. Christ dying on a tree, whereby we may eat and live forever.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.