Christianity Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for committed Christians, experts in Christianity and those interested in learning more. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I'm just wondering about the Bible with the Old Testament and New. Most Christians prefer to use the New Testament (especially the rules).

Some of them don't follow the rules in the Old Testament.But why?

share|improve this question

closed as not a real question by David, Bruce Alderman, Andrew, Affable Geek, warren Dec 31 '12 at 14:51

It's difficult to tell what is being asked here. This question is ambiguous, vague, incomplete, overly broad, or rhetorical and cannot be reasonably answered in its current form. For help clarifying this question so that it can be reopened, visit the help center.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

You seem to be missing some of the fundamental, foundational principles. The core of your question would take a lot of foundational groundwork to explain fully, but it's covered all over this site in various questions already. For example,… addresses the role of The Law to the Christian. As it stands, I think this is overly broad, as described in the FAQ. – David Dec 28 '12 at 7:45
Are you asking about a specific Christian group that prefers the New Testament and ignores the Old Testament? – Bruce Alderman Dec 28 '12 at 18:40
Perhaps a better way to ask this question would be something like "What relationship does the Old Testament have to the New? Can or should they be separated? Should churches focus on one more than the other?" – Narnian Dec 28 '12 at 20:46
I would like to see this question remain - preferably closed, but definately not deleted. It's a valuable signpost. – Affable Geek Jan 14 '13 at 13:58

Not to be picayune here, but the Old Testament is not one book. It is 39. Likewise, the New Testament is 27. This question is akin to asking "Which is more important - the Shakespearian corpus or writings of Camus, Satre, Locke, Asimov, Vonnegaut, C.S. Lewis, and Orson Scott Card. You are asking to compare two libraries from different historical eras with different purposes in writing.

In a nutshell, the Old Testament is a collection of works from about 1000 BC to 400 BC, chronicling the story of the Jews - God's chosen people, to whom he chose to love, redeem, and instruct. It includes:

  • the Torah (the account of the formation of Israel and the covenant that God made with them),
  • the Writings (books like Psalms, Proverbs, and Song of Solomon, plus the history of Israel from Joshua to the exile), and
  • the Prophets (such as Isaiah, Ezekiel, Jonah, Amos, and Malachi).

The New Testament contains the story of Jesus, who was born a Jew, and the people who knew Him. Specifically, there are:

  • four Gospels that chronicle Jesus' life, teachings, death, and resurrection.

After that, there are 23 other books, including:

  • a history of the church (Acts),

  • several letters from Apostles (Paul, James, Peter, John, and Jude), and

  • a vision of the end times given to John (Revelation).

It was written between about 50 AD and 100AD, and focuses on the idea that God became a man, died, was buried, rose again, and through that act of unmerited favor, saved mankind from sin.

Finally, what you are asking - to pick "the most important" violates the principle that all Scripture is fully important, and to pick a 'canon' within a canon is considered heresy. Not that Christians don't regularly do that, but technically, its considered wrong.

To answer the question very crassly, given a choice, most Christians would, if forced to choose, say "the New Testament," because it focuses on the saving power of Jesus. This is evidenced by the fact that Christians will sometimes carry "abbreviated bibles" with just the New Testament and the Psalms.

Then again, there are lots of people who will only eat their meat and dessert, and not the refreshing goodness of bread and vegetables either. To live on just the NT is to deny yourself the background and the full story of God's redemptive purpose. For Christians, it is all profitable and all important.

share|improve this answer
Well said, indeed. – Narnian Dec 28 '12 at 16:55
There are 46 Books in the Old Testament for Catholics! :) – Andrew Dec 28 '12 at 20:39
:) Yeah, Yeah, yeah... How's this (and I saw this as a very, very basic question, so I glossed over stuff): "There are at least 39 books in the OT", or "There are 39 books that all mainline Christians accept in the OT." That said, I son't want to muddy the answer. Trying to keep it simple. – Affable Geek Dec 28 '12 at 20:42
You seem to be using the Jewish division of the Torah, the Prophets, and the Writings. But you list Daniel with the Prophets, which the Jews don't. Are you using some hybrid Jewish/Christian division here? – TRiG Dec 29 '12 at 18:58
@trig. Good catch. Edited. Sadly I do way too much from memory sometimes. – Affable Geek Jan 1 '13 at 16:42

Christianity is incomplete without both the Old Testament and the New Testament, so neither one is more important than the other. They are intertwined. As one person put it,

The New is in the Old, concealed;
The Old is in the New, revealed.

The Old Testament records Creation, God's interaction with mankind, mankind's failure in the age of innocence, conscience, and law. It reveals that, just as Adam's attempts to cover over the shame of his own sin was futile, so all our efforts to atone for our own sin are futile. As mankind is helpless, God points to His own provision to come.

The New Testaments is the fulfillment of this promise of God. He promised He would come, and He did. He promised He would atone for sin, and He did. He promised a new covenant, and He introduced one.

Only the Old and the New Testaments together make sense. The Old without the New tells of a Messiah that never comes. The New without the Old tells of a Messiah that came, but with no indication why He did. Furthermore, the New Testament references the Old quite often, which is also testimony to the fact that the two are inseparable.

Regarding the "rules" of the Old Testament, those were introduced by Moses as the Mosaic Covenant around 1500 B.C. and were in effect until the New Covenant was revealed with the coming of Jesus Christ. The Old Testament spans much more than 1500 years, so these laws were in effect for just a fraction of that time. The Mosaic Covenant was a specific covenant for a specific time with a specific people--from 1500 B. C. to the time of Christ and with the Jewish people. So, while God still commands us to live holy lives, we, as people living in the New Covenant, are not bound to the ceremonial laws of the Old Covenant.

share|improve this answer
Good summary here too :) – Affable Geek Dec 28 '12 at 17:40

protected by Affable Geek Jan 14 '13 at 13:58

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.